Discussion
Statement:
In Bihar, alleged Maoists gunned down 16 villagers over a land row.
Conclusions:
I. The killed villagers had occupied government lands.
II. Maoists have not claimed the killings.
III. Some of the villagers involved in the land row have escaped.
Answer: D
Correct answer: Only II follows
The word to notice is alleged: the killings are attributed to Maoists without their having acknowledged them, which is conclusion II. Conclusion I supplies a version of the land dispute that the statement does not give, and conclusion III adds an escape that is nowhere mentioned. A report of a killing over a land row settles neither the rights of the dispute nor the fate of anyone not killed.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development