Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

A comparison between HPGe and NaI(Tl) detectors for recording spectrum of gamma-rays, it is observed that in general :

  • A.the energy resolution and efficiency of HPGe detector are higher as compared to those of NaI(Tl) detector
  • B.the energy resolution and efficiency of HPGe detector are almost the same as those of NaI(Tl) detector
  • C.for HPGe detector, the energy resolution is high and efficiency is low as compared to those of NaI(Tl) detector
  • D.for HPGe detector the energy resolution is low and efficiency is high as compared to those of NaI(Tl) detector

Answer: C

In general, HPGe has high energy resolution but low efficiency compared with NaI(Tl).

In germanium only about 3 eV is needed to create an electron-hole pair, against roughly 100 eV per photoelectron in a NaI(Tl) scintillator and photomultiplier, so far more charge carriers are produced and statistical fluctuations are much smaller. A typical HPGe detector resolves about 2 keV at 1332 keV, against about 7% (some 90 keV) for NaI(Tl).

NaI(Tl) contains iodine (Z = 53, against germanium's 32), which absorbs gamma rays strongly by the photoelectric effect, and it is grown in much larger crystals, so a typical NaI(Tl) detector stops more of the incident gamma rays. Hence both 'higher' and 'the same' are wrong, and option D reverses the comparison.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.