Discussion
What did the narrator want to infer from the line, 'Partition, he argued, risked unleashing those passions, not dampening them'?
Answer: C
The line says partition risked unleashing communal passions rather than dampening them, so Gandhi argued that partition would lead to communal violence and havoc. Option B says the opposite, A says partition was the only way, and D says personal violence, which the passage does not say. The line itself says that partition risked unleashing those passions, and the next sentences say he had seen in Noakhali what havoc communal fury could wreak once unleashed. So the inference is that partition would bring communal violence and havoc.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development