Discussion
Consider the following statements made on the basis of the above passage.
1. Cultural, social and political narratives instrumental in shaping contemporary India can be better understood through interdisciplinary research between the History of India and Carnatic music.
2. Musical traditions cannot reflect anything about societal changes, religious influences, and the ebb and flow of imperial dynasties.
3. Interdisciplinary research between the History of India and Carnatic Music helps highlight the shared heritage and cultural continuity, ignoring variations across regions.
4. Understanding broader historical contexts is vital to trace the evolution of music styles.
Which of the above statement/s is/are valid/correct?
Answer: A
Statements 1 and 4 are valid.
Statement 1 restates the opening sentence of the passage. Statement 4 follows from the passage's point that exploring the evolution of Carnatic music within its historical context is what lets scholars trace how styles migrated and changed.
Statement 2 contradicts the passage, which says musical traditions reflect societal changes, religious influences and the ebb and flow of dynasties. Statement 3 is wrong because the passage says the work highlights shared heritage while also acknowledging regional variations, not ignoring them. So 'All the above', '2 and 4' and '1 only' are wrong.
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development