Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

A manager refuses to replace a machine because 400 000 was spent on it two years ago. The objection to this reasoning is that the 400 000 is

  • A.already recovered through depreciation
  • B.not recorded at its current market value
  • C.sunk and identical whichever course is taken
  • D.smaller than the challenger's first cost

Answer: C

Correct answer: sunk and identical whichever course is taken

The 400,000 has gone and cannot be recovered by either decision, so it cannot distinguish between them. Keeping an uneconomic machine to avoid admitting the loss simply adds the excess running costs to that loss. The relevant figures are the machine’s market value now and the costs of the two courses from here on.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.