Discussion
In which of the following case the Court held that Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act was Constitutionally violative of right to Human dignity and privacy ?
Answer: B
The court held Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act unconstitutional, as violating the right to human dignity and privacy, in T. Sareetha v. T. Venkata Subbaiah (1983), a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court by Justice Choudary, option B. Later the Delhi High Court in Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh took the opposite view, and the Supreme Court in Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar upheld Section 9. Bipin Chandra v. Prabhavati (A) and Lachman v. Meena (C) are not the case in the key, so B is the answer.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development