Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

If \(\rho_{wsy}\) denotes the intra-class correlation coefficient between pairs of units that are in the same systematic sample and if \(\rho_{wsy} = 0\), then :

  • A.Systematic sampling is as efficient as SRSWOR
  • B.Systematic sampling is more efficient than SRSWOR
  • C.Systematic sampling is as efficient as SRSWR but less efficient than SRSWOR
  • D.Systematic sampling is more efficient than SRSWR

Answer: C

Systematic sampling is as efficient as SRSWR but less efficient than SRSWOR.

For a population of size \(N = nk\), the variance of the systematic sample mean in terms of the intra-class correlation is

\[ \begin{aligned} V(\bar{y}_{sy}) &= \frac{\sigma^{2}}{n}\,[1 + (n - 1)\rho_{wsy}] \\ \sigma^{2} &= \frac{N - 1}{N}S^{2} \end{aligned} \]

With \(\rho_{wsy} = 0\) this is \(\sigma^{2}/n\), exactly the variance of the mean under SRSWR. Under SRSWOR the variance is \(\dfrac{N - n}{N} \cdot \dfrac{S^{2}}{n}\), which is smaller than \(\dfrac{N - 1}{N} \cdot \dfrac{S^{2}}{n}\) whenever \(n \gt 1\), because of the finite population correction.

So systematic sampling matches SRSWR and falls just short of SRSWOR. It beats SRSWOR only when \(\rho_{wsy}\) is negative enough, which rules out the options claiming it is as efficient as or more efficient than SRSWOR, or more efficient than SRSWR.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.