Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Let us consider the two sampling strategies, both based on a sample of size \(n\) : I. SRSWOR II post-stratification. To estimate the population total :

  • A.If the stratum sizes are sufficiently large for each stratum and if the error effects in \(W_{h}\) can be ignored, post-stratification is better than SRSWOR
  • B.SRSWOR is always better than post-stratification
  • C.If \(n\) is sufficiently large, post-stratification is better than SRSWOR
  • D.Post-stratification is always better than SRSWOR

Answer: A

The answer is post-stratification is better than SRSWOR if the stratum sizes are large and errors in \(W_{h}\) can be ignored.

In post-stratification the sample is drawn by SRSWOR and then classified into strata with known weights \(W_{h}\). When the expected sample size in each stratum is large, its variance is approximately that of proportional stratified sampling, plus a small term of order \(1/n^{2}\) from the random stratum sample sizes. Stratification with proportional allocation is never worse than SRS, so under these conditions post-stratification is at least as good as SRSWOR.

Neither method is better always: with small strata the random sample sizes can make post-stratification worse. A large \(n\) alone is not the stated condition; it is the stratum sizes and the accuracy of the weights that matter.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.