Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

In a survey of finite population, the following method is applied to obtain a sample of size \(n\).

(i) In the 1st draw, the ith unit is selected with probability \(P_{i} \gt 0\), \(i = 1, \ldots, N\), \(\sum_{i=1}^{N} Pi = 1\) and \(P_{i} \neq \frac{1}{N}\) for some i.
(ii) The remaining \((n - 1)\) units are obtained by SRSWOR method from remaining N - 1 units of the population.

Let \(\overline{Y}\) denote the sample mean, then :

  • A.\(\overline{Y}\) is an unbiased estimator of population mean
  • B.There exists an unbiased estimator of the population mean and it is different from the sample mean
  • C.This is a stratified sampling procedure
  • D.There does not exist an unbiased estimator of the population mean

Answer: B

The key's answer is that there exists an unbiased estimator of the population mean and it is different from the sample mean.

This is the Midzuno-Sen scheme. Because the first unit is drawn with unequal probabilities \(P_{i}\), the sample mean \(\bar{y}\) gives units different weights from their population shares and is biased (A fails). But the scheme has known inclusion probabilities, so the Horvitz-Thompson estimator, and the ratio-type estimator \(\bar{y}/\big(\sum_{i \in s} P_{i} \cdot \frac{N}{n}\big)\) used with this scheme, are unbiased, which also rules out D.

The procedure draws from the whole population at each stage; it does not divide the population into strata, so C is wrong.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.