Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

The Hall experiment is carried out with a non-magnetic semiconductor. The current \(I\) is along the \(x\)-axis and the magnetic field \(B\) is along the \(z\)-axis. Which one of the following is the CORRECT representation of the variation of the magnitude of the Hall resistivity \(\rho_{xy}\) as a function of the magnetic field?

  • A.Graph of rho xy against B: a horizontal line at constant value
  • B.Graph of rho xy against B: a straight line rising from the origin
  • C.Graph of rho xy against B: a curve that falls with increasing B and flattens
  • D.Graph of rho xy against B: an S-shaped curve from the origin that levels off at a constant value

Answer: B

The Hall resistivity rises linearly with the magnetic field, the straight line through the origin in (B).

In steady state the Hall field balances the magnetic force on the carriers, giving \(E_{y} = v_{x}B = J_{x}B/(ne)\). So

\[ \rho_{xy} = \frac{E_{y}}{J_{x}} = \frac{B}{ne} \]

which is proportional to \(B\) and zero when there is no field. In a non-magnetic material there is no anomalous Hall contribution from a spontaneous magnetisation, so the line passes through the origin.

A constant (A) would mean a Hall signal at zero field; a falling curve (C) has the dependence upside down; and a curve that saturates into a plateau (D) resembles the quantum Hall or anomalous Hall behaviour, not the classical Hall effect asked about.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.