Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Had the minister's party not been seen as a Communist party, he would have easily won the elections.

  • A.Had the minister’s party not been seen as a Communist party, all of those would have easily won
  • B.Had the minister’s party not been seen as a Communist party, they would have easily won the
    elections
  • C.Had the minister’s party not been seen as a Communist party, he could easily have won the
    elections
  • D.Had the minister’s party not been seen as a Communist party, the minister could easily have
    won the elections
  • E.Had the minister’s party not been seen as a Communist party, the minister could have easily
    won the elections

Answer: E

It should read the minister could have easily won the elections.

The subject of the main clause must be named, since he has no antecedent - the party, not the minister, is what the if-clause is about. Could have won also fits a statement about capability better than would have won.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.