Discussion
Assertion (A): Serverless is not always cheaper than a continuously running instance.
Reason (R): At high and steady utilisation the per-invocation price exceeds the cost of a reserved instance.
Answer: A
Correct answer: Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Both are true and the reason gives the crossover. Serverless bills per invocation and per gigabyte-second, which is very cheap when the function runs occasionally and idles the rest of the time. Under continuous load those charges accumulate past the flat cost of a reserved instance of equivalent capacity. The model suits spiky and unpredictable work, not steady throughput.
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development