Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Relationship between compound I and II is :

Two chair cyclohexanes I and II, each carrying three methyl groups in a 1,2,4 pattern with different axial and equatorial placements

  • A.Diastereomers
  • B.Enantiomers
  • C.Conformational isomers
  • D.Constitutional isomers

Answer: A

Compounds I and II are diastereomers.

Both are trimethylcyclohexanes with the same 1,2,4 substitution pattern, so they are not constitutional isomers. Reading the chairs, in I all three methyl groups lie on the same face of the ring. In II the methyl at the position corresponding to one of the adjacent pair points to the opposite face from the other two.

Ring flipping changes axial and equatorial positions but never which face a group is on, so II cannot be a conformer of I. A different relative configuration that is not a mirror image is diastereomerism, so they are diastereomers rather than enantiomers.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.