Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

The case of Rylands Vs. Fletcher deals with :

  • A.Liability of manufacturer towards consumers
  • B.Non-natural use of land
  • C.Negligence of a person who has undertaken the work
  • D.Non-intentional act of the independent contractor.

Answer: B

Rylands v Fletcher deals with non-natural use of land.

In this 1868 House of Lords case, water from the defendants' reservoir burst through old mine shafts and flooded the plaintiff's mine. The rule laid down is that a person who brings onto his land and keeps there something likely to do mischief if it escapes is answerable for all the damage it causes if it escapes, even without negligence. Lord Cairns added that the rule applies to a non-natural use of the land.

The manufacturer's liability to consumers is Donoghue v Stevenson. The case did not turn on negligence or on a contractor's acts; liability was strict.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.