Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

'A' makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box, and finds after so opening the box, that there is no jewel in it.

  • A.'A' has not committed any offence
  • B.'A' is guilty of offence of theft
  • C.'A' is guilty for attempt to commit theft
  • D.'A' is guilty for conspiracy to commit theft

Answer: C

'A' is guilty for attempt to commit theft.

This is the illustration (a) to section 511 IPC. Breaking open the box is an act done towards stealing, and the attempt is complete once he does that act with intent to steal. That the box turns out to be empty does not save him: impossibility of the object does not excuse an attempt.

He is not guilty of theft, because nothing was taken. 'No offence' ignores section 511, and conspiracy needs an agreement between two or more persons, which a single person acting alone does not have.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.