Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Which one of the following is not the grounds for refusal to register the trademarks u/s 11 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 ?

  • A.If the trademark is, because of its identity with an earlier trademark and similarity of goods or services covered by the trademark, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of public
  • B.If the trademark is, because of its similarity to an earlier trademark and similarity of goods or services covered by the trademark, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of public
  • C.If the trademark is, to the extend that, its use in India is liable to be prevented by virtue of any law in particular that law of passing off protecting an unregistered trademark used in the course of trade, or by virtue of Law of Copyright
  • D.If the trademark is to the extend that its use in India is liable to cause serious prejudice to public policy, may hamper the economic policy of government or cause serious prejudice to public sentiment

Answer: D

The one that is not a ground under section 11 is the public policy, economic policy and public sentiment ground.

Section 11 sets out the relative grounds for refusal, which depend on earlier rights. Section 11(1)(a) bars a mark identical to an earlier mark for similar goods, and 11(1)(b) a similar mark for identical or similar goods, where confusion is likely (options A and B). Section 11(3) bars a mark whose use may be prevented by the law of passing off or by copyright law (option C).

Option D's grounds of prejudice to public policy, economic policy or public sentiment are not among them; the absolute grounds in section 9 deal with deception, religious susceptibilities and scandalous or obscene matter, which are different again.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.