Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Consider the following vector \(\vec{V} = x\,y\,z\,\hat{k}\).

Which of the following statements is correct for the resultant vector \(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V}\)?

  • A.It lies in \(xy\) - plane
  • B.It lies in \(yz\) - plane
  • C.It lies in \(xz\) - plane
  • D.It is along the x direction

Answer: A

The resultant vector lies in the \(xy\)-plane.

Use the identity below with \(\vec{V} = xyz\,\hat{k}\):

\[ \begin{aligned} & \nabla \times (\nabla \times \vec{V}) \\ &= \nabla(\nabla \cdot \vec{V}) - \nabla^{2}\vec{V} \end{aligned} \]

\[ \begin{aligned} \nabla \cdot \vec{V} &= \frac{\partial (xyz)}{\partial z} = xy \\ \nabla(xy) &= y\,\hat{\imath} + x\,\hat{\jmath} \\ \nabla^{2}(xyz) &= 0 \end{aligned} \]

So \(\nabla \times \nabla \times \vec{V} = y\,\hat{\imath} + x\,\hat{\jmath}\), which has no \(\hat{k}\) component and lies in the \(xy\)-plane. Working it directly gives the same: \(\nabla \times \vec{V} = xz\,\hat{\imath} - yz\,\hat{\jmath}\), whose curl is \(y\,\hat{\imath} + x\,\hat{\jmath}\).

It has both \(\hat{\imath}\) and \(\hat{\jmath}\) parts, so it is not along \(x\) alone, and it has no \(z\) component, so it cannot lie in the \(yz\)- or \(xz\)-plane in general.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.