Antenna Arrays Questions and Answers

Q: Why is the array factor computed with isotropic sources rather than real elements?

Treating the elements as isotropic separates what the geometry and the feeding do from what the element itself does, and the two are recombined by multiplication at the end. That separation is what makes array design a manageable subject rather than a fresh electromagnetic problem for every layout. Real elements can be handled numerically, no practical array uses isotropic radiators since none exists, and the element pattern certainly does shape the result, particularly at wide angles where it suppresses grating lobes.

Q: What effect does the element pattern have on grating lobes?

A grating lobe near the horizon falls where a directive element radiates little, so the element pattern can suppress it by many decibels even though the array factor puts a full lobe there. Designers rely on this to permit slightly wider spacing than the strict half wavelength rule. It cannot remove a grating lobe that appears near boresight, and it does not move them, since their position is fixed by the geometry. Pattern multiplication is doing useful work here rather than merely bookkeeping.

Q: What is the effect of feeding an array with unequal cable lengths?

Extra cable is extra delay, so an unintended progressive phase appears and the beam is displaced, while random differences raise the side lobes. This is why corporate feeds are laid out with deliberately equal path lengths and why cable sets are cut and measured together. Loss does differ slightly with length and gives a small amplitude error too, but the phase effect dominates. Element resonance and coupling are properties of the radiating structure and are not changed by what feeds it.

Q: Why are array elements often measured in place rather than in isolation?

Coupling to its neighbours alters both the impedance an element presents and the pattern it radiates, so the embedded or active element pattern is the meaningful one. Predicting scanned performance from an isolated measurement can be badly wrong, and scan blindness would not appear at all. Chamber availability, excitation difficulty and convenience are practical matters rather than the reason. The general principle is that a component in a system should be characterised in the system.

Q: What does the term aperture distribution mean for an array?

Aperture distribution is the set of complex excitations applied across the array, and the far field pattern is essentially its Fourier transform. Choosing it is the whole of pattern synthesis. The physical layout is the lattice, the division of power between lobes is a result rather than an input, and impedance variation is a consequence of coupling. Recognising the transform relationship immediately explains why a smooth taper gives low side lobes and a sharp edge does not.

Q: What happens to the pattern if the aperture distribution is a rectangular function?

The transform of a rectangle is a sinc, so a uniformly excited aperture gives the familiar narrow main lobe with side lobes 13.2 decibels down. A Gaussian distribution would give a Gaussian pattern with no side lobes but is not physically realisable in finite length. Uniform radiation over all angles would need a point source, and lobe splitting requires antiphase regions in the aperture. The transform pair is worth remembering because it is the reference case for every taper.

Q: What is the effect of a phase reversal across half the aperture?

Two halves in antiphase cancel exactly in the boresight direction and reinforce at angles where the path difference compensates, giving a difference pattern with a deep central null. This is precisely the difference channel of a monopulse tracking antenna, whose sharp null gives far better angular accuracy than any beam maximum. A smooth linear phase gradient steers the beam instead, and relative phase is exactly what matters, which is why the change is so drastic.

Q: What is a monopulse antenna arrangement used for?

Monopulse forms a sum pattern and a difference pattern simultaneously, and the ratio of their outputs gives the angular error from a single pulse, without the sequential lobing that earlier trackers needed. The sharp null of the difference channel is what provides the accuracy. It says nothing about peak power, does not imply a single lobed pattern, and duplexing between transmit and receive is a separate function performed by a circulator or switch. Working one numerical case through both cases side by side fixes the distinction better than any rule of thumb.

81.

What determines how sharply an array pattern falls away from its main beam?

A.The aperture size and the amplitude distribution together
B.The impedance presented by each element to the feed network
C.The power delivered to the array by the transmitter driving it
D.The polarisation of the individual radiating elements used

Answer: A

Aperture in wavelengths fixes the beamwidth and the amplitude distribution fixes the side lobe structure, so the two together decide the whole shape of the roll off. Impedance affects how much power gets in rather than where it goes, transmitter power scales the pattern without changing its shape, and polarisation determines what a receiver can capture rather than the angular distribution. Separating the variables that shape a pattern from those that scale it is the first step in reading any array specification sensibly.

Discuss in Forum

82.

Why is the array factor computed with isotropic sources rather than real elements?

A.The element pattern has no effect on the final radiation pattern
B.It isolates the effect of geometry and excitation from the element
C.Real elements would make the calculation impossible to carry out
D.Isotropic sources are what practical arrays actually use in practice

Answer: B

Treating the elements as isotropic separates what the geometry and the feeding do from what the element itself does, and the two are recombined by multiplication at the end. That separation is what makes array design a manageable subject rather than a fresh electromagnetic problem for every layout. Real elements can be handled numerically, no practical array uses isotropic radiators since none exists, and the element pattern certainly does shape the result, particularly at wide angles where it suppresses grating lobes.

Discuss in Forum

83.

What effect does the element pattern have on grating lobes?

A.It moves them closer to the main beam of the complete array
B.It has no influence because grating lobes come from the spacing alone
C.It attenuates them if they fall where the element radiates weakly
D.It removes them entirely whatever the element spacing chosen

Answer: C

A grating lobe near the horizon falls where a directive element radiates little, so the element pattern can suppress it by many decibels even though the array factor puts a full lobe there. Designers rely on this to permit slightly wider spacing than the strict half wavelength rule. It cannot remove a grating lobe that appears near boresight, and it does not move them, since their position is fixed by the geometry. Pattern multiplication is doing useful work here rather than merely bookkeeping.

Discuss in Forum

84.

What is the effect of feeding an array with unequal cable lengths?

A.An amplitude error that lowers the total radiated power
B.A change in the resonant frequency of every element
C.An increase in the mutual coupling between the elements
D.A phase error that tilts or distorts the beam

Answer: D

Extra cable is extra delay, so an unintended progressive phase appears and the beam is displaced, while random differences raise the side lobes. This is why corporate feeds are laid out with deliberately equal path lengths and why cable sets are cut and measured together. Loss does differ slightly with length and gives a small amplitude error too, but the phase effect dominates. Element resonance and coupling are properties of the radiating structure and are not changed by what feeds it.

Discuss in Forum

85.

Why are array elements often measured in place rather than in isolation?

A.The array environment changes the element pattern and impedance
B.Isolated measurement requires an anechoic chamber that is rarely available
C.The element cannot be excited properly outside its own array structure
D.Measurement in place is quicker and needs no special equipment at all

Answer: A

Coupling to its neighbours alters both the impedance an element presents and the pattern it radiates, so the embedded or active element pattern is the meaningful one. Predicting scanned performance from an isolated measurement can be badly wrong, and scan blindness would not appear at all. Chamber availability, excitation difficulty and convenience are practical matters rather than the reason. The general principle is that a component in a system should be characterised in the system.

Discuss in Forum

86.

What does the term aperture distribution mean for an array?

A.The variation of the element impedance across the array face
B.The amplitude and phase across the radiating elements
C.The physical arrangement of the elements on their supporting frame
D.The way the radiated power is distributed among the pattern lobes

Answer: B

Aperture distribution is the set of complex excitations applied across the array, and the far field pattern is essentially its Fourier transform. Choosing it is the whole of pattern synthesis. The physical layout is the lattice, the division of power between lobes is a result rather than an input, and impedance variation is a consequence of coupling. Recognising the transform relationship immediately explains why a smooth taper gives low side lobes and a sharp edge does not.

Discuss in Forum

87.

Why is the far field pattern the Fourier transform of the aperture distribution?

A.Fourier methods are chosen simply because they are easy to compute
B.The pattern is measured with an instrument that performs a transform
C.Each aperture point contributes a phase proportional to its position
D.The elements are always spaced at regular intervals across the array

Answer: C

In the far field the path difference from a point at position x to an observation angle is proportional to x, so the contribution carries a linear phase in position and the summation is exactly a Fourier integral. Uniform spacing makes it a discrete transform but is not the cause. The relationship is physical rather than a computational convenience, and it is why every window function in signal processing has an antenna taper counterpart with the same properties.

Discuss in Forum

88.

What happens to the pattern if the aperture distribution is a rectangular function?

A.The pattern is a Gaussian shape with no side lobes at all
B.The pattern is uniform over all angles within the visible region
C.The pattern splits into two symmetric lobes about the array axis
D.The pattern is a sinc function with minus 13 dB side lobes

Answer: D

The transform of a rectangle is a sinc, so a uniformly excited aperture gives the familiar narrow main lobe with side lobes 13.2 decibels down. A Gaussian distribution would give a Gaussian pattern with no side lobes but is not physically realisable in finite length. Uniform radiation over all angles would need a point source, and lobe splitting requires antiphase regions in the aperture. The transform pair is worth remembering because it is the reference case for every taper.

Discuss in Forum

89.

What is the effect of a phase reversal across half the aperture?

A.A null appears on boresight with lobes either side
B.The beam is steered smoothly to one side of boresight
C.The side lobes fall while the main beam stays where it is
D.The pattern is unchanged since only relative phase matters

Answer: A

Two halves in antiphase cancel exactly in the boresight direction and reinforce at angles where the path difference compensates, giving a difference pattern with a deep central null. This is precisely the difference channel of a monopulse tracking antenna, whose sharp null gives far better angular accuracy than any beam maximum. A smooth linear phase gradient steers the beam instead, and relative phase is exactly what matters, which is why the change is so drastic.

Discuss in Forum

90.

What is a monopulse antenna arrangement used for?

A.Switching rapidly between transmit and receive on one antenna
B.Measuring the angle of a target from one received pulse
C.Transmitting a single pulse of very high peak power
D.Producing a pattern with only one lobe in each plane

Answer: B

Monopulse forms a sum pattern and a difference pattern simultaneously, and the ratio of their outputs gives the angular error from a single pulse, without the sequential lobing that earlier trackers needed. The sharp null of the difference channel is what provides the accuracy. It says nothing about peak power, does not imply a single lobed pattern, and duplexing between transmit and receive is a separate function performed by a circulator or switch. Working one numerical case through both cases side by side fixes the distinction better than any rule of thumb.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Antenna Arrays Questions and Answers || Antenna Arrays MCQ Questions and Answers || Antenna Arrays GK Questions and Answers || Antenna Arrays GK MCQ Questions || Antenna Arrays Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Antenna Arrays GK || GK on Antenna Arrays || Antenna and Wave Propagation Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation MCQ Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation GK Questions and Answers || GK on Antenna and Wave Propagation

Antenna Arrays Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications