It is up to our government and planners to devise ways and means for the mobilisation of about ten crore workers whose families total up about forty crore men, women and children. Our agriculture is over-manned. A lesser number of agriculturists would mean more purchasing or spending power to every agriculturist. This will result in the shortage of man-power for many commodities to be produced for which there will be a new demand from a prosperous agrarian class. This shortage will be removed by surplus man-power released from agriculture as suggested above.
The passage best supports the statement that:
Answer: B
Correct answer: Indian economy is in a poor shape basically due to improper mobilisation of man-power.
The argument is one of misallocation. Agriculture is over-manned; fewer agriculturists would mean more purchasing power each; the new demand from a prosperous agrarian class would create a shortage of workers elsewhere; and that shortage would be met by the surplus released from agriculture.
Every step turns on where labour sits rather than on how much of it there is, and the passage opens by asking government and planners to devise means of mobilisation. That is the theme.
Please log in or register to report this question.