Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Statement - Arguments Questions and Answers

Important Instructions
Direction for [ Question No: 1 To 10 ] :

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer: (A) If only argument I is strong (B) If only argument II is strong (C) If either I or II is strong (D) If neither I nor II is strong (E) If both I and II are strong.

1.

Statement: Should India encourage exports, when most things are insufficient for internal use itself?

Arguments:

1. Yes. We have to earn foreign exchange to pay for our imports.

2. No. Even selective encouragement would lead to shortages.

Answer: A

Clearly, India can export only the surplus and that which can be saved after fulfilling its own needs, to pay for its imports. Encouragement to export cannot lead to shortages as it shall provide the resources for imports. So, only argument I holds.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
2.

Statement: Should all the drugs patented and manufactured in Western countries be first tried out on sample basis before giving licence for sale to general public in India?

Arguments:

1. Yes. Many such drugs require different doses and duration for Indian population and hence it is necessary.

2. No. This is just not feasible and hence cannot be implemented.

Answer: A

Clearly, health of the citizens is an issue of major concern for the Government. So, a product like drugs, must be first studied and tested in the Indian context before giving licence for its sale. So, only argument I holds strong

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
3.

Statement: Should India make efforts to harness solar energy to fulfil its energy requirements?

Arguments:

1. Yes, Most of the energy sources used at present are exhaustible.

2. No. Harnessing solar energy requires a lot of capital, which India lacks.

Answer: A

Correct answer: Only argument I is strong

Argument 1 gives the decisive reason: the fuels now in use will run out, while sunlight will not. Argument 2 raises the cost of harnessing it, but a large initial outlay is a reason for planning the investment rather than for forgoing the source. Only I is strong.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
4.

Statement: Should there be students union in college/university?

Arguments:

1. No. This will create a political atmosphere in the campus.

2. Yes, it is very necessary Students are future political leaders

Answer: E

The students union formation shall be a step towards giving to students the basic education in the field of politics. However, it shall create the same political atmosphere in the campus. Thus, both the arguments hold strong

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
5.

Statement: Should India give away Kashmir to Pakistan?

Arguments:

1. No. Kashmir is a beautiful state. It earns a lot of foreign exchange for India.

2. Yes. This would help settle conflicts

Answer: A

Clearly, India cannot part with a state that is a major foreign exchange earner to it. So, argument I holds strong. Further, giving away a piece of land unconditionally and unreasonably is no solution to settle disputes. So, argument II is vague.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
6.

Statement: Should cottage industries be encouraged in rural areas?

Arguments:

1. Yes. Rural people are creative.

2. Yes. This would help to solve the problem of unemployment to some extent.

Answer: B

Correct answer: Only argument II is strong

Argument 2 names a real benefit: cottage industry provides work where little other employment exists. Argument 1 offers a compliment rather than a reason - creativity is not peculiar to rural people and does not by itself justify the policy. Only II is strong.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
7.

Statement: Should young entrepreneurs be encouraged?

Arguments:

1. Yes. They will help in industrial development of the country.

2. Yes. They will reduce the burden on employment market.

Answer: E

Clearly, encouraging the young entrepreneurs will open up the field for the establishment of new industries. Thus, it shall help in industrial development and not only employ the entrepreneurs but create more job opportunities for others as well. So, both the arguments hold strong

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
8.

Statement: Should all the annual examinations up to Std. V be abolished?

Arguments:

1. Yes. The young students should not be burdened with such examinations which hampers their natural growth.

2. No. The students will not study seriously as they will get automatic promotion to the next class and this will affect them in future.

Answer: E

Correct answer: Both I and II are strong

Both arguments bear on the question and both carry weight. Formal examinations do press on children who are still growing, which is argument 1; and without any test pupils may not work at all, which is argument 2. The decision turns on weighing the two. Both are strong.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
9.

Statement: Should Indian scientists working abroad be called back to India?

Arguments:

1. Yes. They must serve the motherland first and forget about discoveries, honours, facilities and all.

2. No. We have enough talent; let them stay where they want.

Answer: D

Clearly, every person must be free to work wherever he wants and no compulsion should be made to confine one to one's own country. So, argument I is vague. However, talented scientists can be of great benefit to the nation and some alternatives as special incentives or better prospects may be made available to them to retain them within their motherland. So, argument II also does not hold

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
10.

Statement: Should we scrap the system of formal education beyond graduation?

Arguments:

1. Yes. It will mean taking employment at an early date.

2. No. It will mean lack of depth of knowledge

Answer: B

Clearly, argument I is vague because at present too, many fields are open to all after graduation. However, eliminating the post-graduate courses would abolish higher and specialized studies which lead to understanding things better and deeply. So, argument II is valid

Please log in or register to report this question.

Discuss in Forum
Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Statement - Arguments Questions and Answers || Statement - Arguments MCQ Questions and Answers || Statement - Arguments GK Questions and Answers || Statement - Arguments GK MCQ Questions || Statement - Arguments Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Statement - Arguments GK || GK on Statement - Arguments || Reasoning Questions and Answers || Reasoning MCQ Questions and Answers || Reasoning GK Questions and Answers || GK on Reasoning

About Us

ExamsRepo

Copyright © 2026 ExamsRepo . All Rights Reserved . With