Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Data Interpretation Questions and Answers

Important Instructions
Direction for [ Question No: 1 To 4 ] :

Following table provides the data regarding the people who are seeking asylum in different countries. Asylum seekers: Share of top 15 receiving countries in total number of applications

All the data given in the table below are in percentages. For example, in 2007, USA received 15% applications out of total asylum seekers applications.

Countries: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
USA: 15 13 13 15 17
France: 9 9 11 13 12
Germany: 6 6 7 11 10
Italy: 4 8 5 3 8
Sweden: 11 6 6 9 7
Belgium: 3 3 5 6 6
UK: 8 8 8 6 6
Canada: 8 10 9 6 6
Switzerland: 3 4 4 4 4
Turkey: 2 3 2 3 4
Austria: 4 3 4 3 3
Netherlands: 2 4 4 4 3
Australia: 1 1 2 3 3
Greece: 8 5 4 3 2
Norway: 2 4 5 3 2

1.

The sum of percentage of applications received by the top three rank countries is more than the sum of percentage of applications received by the remaining countries in the table, in number of years:

Exam Year(s)

HPPSC HPAS - 2021,

Answer: D

The top three countries never out-weigh the rest, so the answer is None of these: it happens in 0 years.

Add up each year's column and take the three largest shares:

\[ \begin{aligned} 2007 &: \text{all } 86,\ \text{top three } 15 + 11 + 9 = 35 \\ 2008 &: \text{all } 87,\ \text{top three } 13 + 10 + 9 = 32 \\ 2009 &: \text{all } 89,\ \text{top three } 13 + 11 + 9 = 33 \\ 2010 &: \text{all } 92,\ \text{top three } 15 + 13 + 11 = 39 \\ 2011 &: \text{all } 93,\ \text{top three } 17 + 12 + 10 = 39 \end{aligned} \]

The remaining twelve countries hold 51, 55, 56, 53 and 54, which is more than the top three every year. So the number of years is zero, which is not offered as 1, 2 or 3.

Please log in or register to report this question.

2.

The sum of ranks of Germany across the given duration is:

Exam Year(s)

HPPSC HPAS - 2021,

Answer: C

The ranks of Germany add up to 24.

Rank each year by share, counting tied countries at the same rank and skipping the next rank, as the key does:

\[ \begin{aligned} 2007 &: \text{share } 6,\ \text{rank } 7 \\ 2008 &: \text{share } 6,\ \text{rank } 6 \\ 2009 &: \text{share } 7,\ \text{rank } 5 \\ 2010 &: \text{share } 11,\ \text{rank } 3 \\ 2011 &: \text{share } 10,\ \text{rank } 3 \end{aligned} \]

In 2007 six countries are above Germany (USA 15, Sweden 11, France 9, and UK, Canada and Greece at 8), so Germany is 7th. In 2008 five are above it (13, 10, 9, 8, 8) and Sweden ties with it at 6. In 2009 four are above (13, 11, 9, 8), and in 2010 and 2011 only the USA and France are above. The sum is 7 + 6 + 5 + 3 + 3 = 24. Ranking without skipping after ties would give 21, which is not offered.

Please log in or register to report this question.

3.

Between 2007 and 2011, the United States of America received the largest number of asylum seekers = 278800 applications. Then the total number of asylum seekers applications received by France during the same period (approximately) is:

Exam Year(s)

HPPSC HPAS - 2021,

Answer: D

The figure cannot be determined.

Each percentage in the table is a share of that year's total number of applications, and the yearly totals are not given. USA's five shares add up to 73, but the 278800 applications are the sum of 15%, 13%, 13%, 15% and 17% of five different totals. Without the yearly totals, France's 54 (the sum of its shares) cannot be turned into a number of applications.

If the totals were assumed equal, France would get \(\frac{54}{73} \times 278800 \approx 206000\), which matches none of the figures offered, so 216000, 262800 and 243900 are not obtainable by any reading.

Please log in or register to report this question.

4.

The country which has seen the minimum variation in 2011 over 2007 in the ranking as the destination for the asylum seekers is:

Exam Year(s)

HPPSC HPAS - 2021,

Answer: A

The USA shows the minimum variation: none, since it is first in both years.

Rank the four countries in 2007 and 2011 by share, with tied countries on the same rank:

\[ \begin{aligned} \text{USA} &: 1 \to 1,\ \text{change } 0 \\ \text{France} &: 3 \to 2,\ \text{change } 1 \\ \text{Germany} &: 7 \to 3,\ \text{change } 4 \\ \text{UK} &: 4 \to 6,\ \text{change } 2 \end{aligned} \]

In 2007 the UK's 8% is tied with Canada and Greece behind USA, Sweden and France, and in 2011 its 6% is tied with Belgium and Canada behind five countries. The smallest change is the USA's zero.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 5 To 5 ] :

In the 2020 summer Olympics’ Javelin throw finals, Neeraj Chopra exhibited a spectacular performance to win the gold medal. The silver medal was won by Jakub Vadlejch and the bronze medal was won by Vitezlav Vesely. There were six rounds of throws with each athlete having one throw per round. The best of all the throws of each athlete is considered for the medal. Following were the observations about the throws:

i. The first and second rounds were dominated by Neeraj Chopra with a gold medal performance in his second throw, while the other two athletes did not have any medal winning throws in these rounds.
ii. The throws in the last round by both Jakub Vadlejch and Vitezlav Vesely were fouls and were not considered for scoring.
iii. After four rounds, Vitezlav Vesely was in the second position and could not improve upon his best throw in the succeeding rounds.
iv. In the fourth round, the throw by Jakub Vadlejch was the best in that round.

5.

In which round did Vitezlav Vesely have his best throw?

Exam Year(s)

GATE CS - 2026,

Answer: A

Vesely's best throw was in the third round.

  • From (i), neither Vadlejch nor Vesely made a medal-winning throw in rounds 1 and 2, so Vesely's best (his bronze-winning throw) came in round 3 or later.
  • From (iii), Vesely could not improve after round 4, so his best came no later than round 4. Round 6 is also ruled out by (ii), as it was a foul.
  • From (iv), Vadlejch's round 4 throw beat Vesely's round 4 throw. But after four rounds Vesely was ahead of Vadlejch, so Vesely's best must exceed Vadlejch's round 4 throw, and therefore cannot be his own round 4 throw.

That leaves round 3. Vadlejch, who finished second, must have produced his silver-winning throw in round 5, which is consistent with all four observations.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 6 To 6 ] :

Study the given table and answer the questions that follow.

The table represents the number of candidates appeared, qualified, and selected in a national level examination from four different schools M, N, O and P over the years 2012 to 2017.

Where A: Appeared; Q: Qualified ; S: Selected

YearMNOP
AQSAQSAQSAQS
2012700075084300040034200025027150016023
2013550050055350042056250034036250029056
2014650045542380046066350038048270048067
2015850085489450048572450056057340054087
2016900092292469067886567066068370065089
2017920094294670070092678068089450067093

6.

In the year 2017, which school had the highest percentage of candidates selected over the candidates appeared?

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB - 2023,

Answer: D

School P had the highest percentage.

In 2017 the selected-to-appeared percentages are: M 94/9200 = 1.02%, N 92/6700 = 1.37%, O 89/6780 = 1.31% and P 93/4500 = 2.07%.

P is the highest. M, N and O are all below 1.4%.

The question asks for the percentage selected out of those who appeared, not the percentage who qualified. P has the smallest number of candidates appearing (4500) and a high number selected (93), which makes its ratio the highest. A common mistake is to pick M, which has the largest number selected, 94.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 7 To 7 ] :

The following table shows the production of minerals for some years as given. Production (in thousand tonnes)

YearAluminiumLeadNickelCopperMicaZincIron-ore
1990-912004822622256941100
1991-9224811223231068981120
1992-93306160238298601081122
1993-9436412624828876961132
1994-95410188246314841141116
1995-965602082783281001121124
1996-97620234368372921201142

7.

Which mineral had a continuous decrease in production over the given years from 1991-92 to 1993-94?

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB PGT - 2023,

Answer: B

Copper is the mineral whose production decreased continuously from 1991-92 to 1993-94. Its production was 310, 298 and 288 thousand tonnes in the three years, so it fell in each year.

Lead was 112, 160 and 126, so it rose in 1992-93 and then fell. Nickel was 232, 238 and 248, so it rose every year. Zinc was 98, 108 and 96, so it rose and then fell. A continuous decrease needs a fall at both steps, and only copper has that.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 8 To 8 ] :

The number of candidates who appeared, qualified, and were chosen in a competitive examination from five districts of West Bengal, Nadia, Howrah, Burdwan, Hooghly and Bankura between the years of 2010 and 2014 are shown in the given table.

YearNadiaHowrahBurdwanHooghlyBankura
AppQualSelAppQualSelAppQualSelAppQualSelAppQualSel
2010800085094780081082750072078820068085640070075
2011480050048750080065560062085680060070710065075
2012750064082740056070480040048650052565520035055
2013950085090880092086700065070780072084640054060
2014900080070720085075850095080570048560450060075

8.

In 2012, what was the approximate percentage of the total number of candidates selected to the total number of candidates qualified for all five districts?

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB PGT - 2023,

Answer: A

The answer is about 13 per cent. For 2012 add the candidates selected in the five districts: 82 + 70 + 48 + 65 + 55 = 320. Add those who qualified: 640 + 560 + 400 + 525 + 350 = 2475. The required percentage is \[\frac{320}{2475} \times 100 \approx 12.9\] which is about 13 per cent. The options 10, 8 and 15 per cent are further from 12.9. The table was read from the page image, where the 2014 Bankura appeared figure reads 4500.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 9 To 9 ] :

Directions (Q19-Q20): Study the following graph carefully and answer the questions given below:

Total Number of Students Appeared and Qualified from Various Schools at a Scholarship Exam.

SchoolAppearedQualified
A32502000
B20001250
C30002000
D25001500
E27502000

9.

Find the difference between appeared and qualified number of students from school B.

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB - 2023,

Answer: B

The difference for school B is 750. From the data the number of students from school B who appeared is 2000 and the number who qualified is 1250. \[ 2000 - 1250 = 750 \] The values 650, 850 and 950 do not match the difference; 650 and 850 are close to it, but they are not the figures of the bars of school B.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 10 To 10 ] :

The following radar chart shows the performance scores (out of 100) of three companies on four different metrics. Study the chart and answer the questions.

10.

For which company is the area covered by the polygon on the chart the largest?

Answer: B

A larger area on a radar chart generally indicates higher values across the board. By visual inspection of the data points, Company B has the highest or second-highest values on most metrics (Sales: 90, Profit: 85, Market Share: 75, Customer Sat.: 90). Company A has lower values (e.g., Sales 70, Market Share 60) and Company C also has lower values in some areas (Profit 60, Customer Sat. 70). Therefore, Company B covers the largest area.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Loading…
Tags: Data Interpretation Questions and Answers || DI MCQ Questions || Data Analysis Quantitative Aptitude || Data Interpretation GK Questions || DI on Quantitative Aptitude