Let \(f: (1,2) \to \mathbb{R}\) be a continuous function satisfying
\(\lim_{x \to 1+} f(x) = 3\) and \(\lim_{x \to 2-} f(x) = 3\).
Then which ONE of the following is necessarily TRUE?
IIT JAM - 2026,
Answer: B
The necessarily true statement is: \(f\) is bounded and \(f\) has a maximum or a minimum or both.
Because both one-sided limits exist, \(f\) extends to a continuous function on the closed interval \([1,2]\) with the value 3 at both ends. A continuous function on a closed bounded interval is bounded, so \(f\) is bounded and the unbounded option is out.
Now take cases. If \(f \equiv 3\), every point is both a maximum and a minimum. If \(f(x_0) \gt 3\) somewhere, the maximum of the extension exceeds 3, so it is not at an endpoint and is attained inside \((1,2)\). If \(f(x_0) \lt 3\) somewhere, the minimum is attained inside in the same way. So at least one always exists.
'Neither' is never possible. 'One but not both' fails for the constant function, and 'both' is not forced either: \(3 + (x-1)(2-x)\) has a maximum at \(x = \frac{3}{2}\) and no minimum on the open interval.
Please log in or register to report this question.