Energy required to grind from 4 mm, predicted by three laws.
| Final size (mm) | Kick (kWh/t) | Bond (kWh/t) | Rittinger (kWh/t) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 5.5 | 6.2 | 3.0 |
| 1.0 | 11.1 | 12.0 | 9.0 |
| 0.5 | 16.6 | 19.0 | 21.0 |
| 0.25 | 22.2 | 29.0 | 45.0 |
What do the three predictions show as the final size falls?
Answer: C
Correct answer: Rittinger rises steepest and overtakes
At 2 mm Rittinger predicts the lowest of the three, but by 0.25 mm it predicts 45 kWh/t against Kick’s 22. Its energy is proportional to the new surface created, which goes as the reciprocal of particle size, so it climbs far faster than Kick’s logarithmic form as the product gets finer. This is exactly why Kick suits coarse crushing and Rittinger fine grinding.
Please log in or register to report this question.