Longitudinal control arrangements compared.
| Arrangement | Control power | Feel | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elevator on fixed tailplane | Moderate | Natural | Most light aircraft |
| Variable incidence with elevator | High | Natural | Large transports |
| All moving stabilator | Very high | Too light without a tab | Light and fast aircraft |
| Elevons | Moderate | Depends on system | Tailless aircraft |
Why does the third arrangement need an anti-servo tab?
Answer: C
Correct answer: High control power, very low hinge moment
The table's own columns give the answer: very high control power alongside feel described as too light without a tab. Those two facts together are the problem.
Deflecting the whole surface changes its angle of attack directly, so a small movement produces a large pitching moment, while the surface is closely balanced about its pivot and generates little hinge moment. The stick force per g would be below what certification allows, and a pilot could reach a high load factor almost inadvertently. The anti-servo tab restores the force.
Please log in or register to report this question.