Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Deriving Conclusions from Passages Questions and Answers

Direction for [ Question No: 1 To 1 ] :

Study the given inference that is followed by some paragraphs. You have to find the paragraph(s) from which it is inferred and select the most appropriate option.

Inference: Chinese sculpture

1. King Zheng was the first person to rule China's entire region. In 221 BC, he conquered the entire land and ruled for eleven years. He was hailed as the First Emperor when he passed away in 210 BC. It was said that he conquered the world with an army of one million armoured soldiers, one thousand chariots, and ten thousand horses.

2. His people couldn't imagine any more land outside of his kingdom because it was so big. In the centre of China, Zheng was buried beneath a massive mound near his capital, Chang'an. The Great Wall of China was built, a grand royal palace was built, and thousands of literary and philosophical works were destroyed in the infamous Burning of the Books during his reign.

3. A life-size terracotta or clay model army was buried at a nearby place. Even though Zheng's stories said this army was smaller, it was still very big. It had 1,400 charioteers and cavalrymen, 6,000 foot soldiers, and even a command unit. Each individual clay model may have depicted a real man. In 1974, the terracotta army was discovered.

1.

Study the given inference that is followed by some paragraphs. You have to find the paragraph(s) from which it is inferred and select the most appropriate option.

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB PGT - 2023,

Answer: C

The inference ‘Chinese sculpture’ comes from paragraph 3 only. Paragraph 3 describes the life-size terracotta (clay) model army buried near the emperor, with its chariots, cavalry, foot soldiers and the individual clay figures, which is Chinese sculpture.

Paragraph 1 is about King Zheng's conquest and his army in general, and paragraph 2 covers the burial mound, the Great Wall and the Burning of the Books, so neither deals with sculpture, which excludes ‘Only 1’, ‘Only 2’ and ‘Only 1 and 2’.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 2 To 2 ] :

Study the given inference that is followed by some paragraphs. You have to find the paragraph(s) from which it is inferred and select the most appropriate option.

1. A reformer must be aware that people are moved by real life, not just writing. The books that were written by Lokmanya Tilak and other reformers sold little, but they had a huge impact on the media. It was common knowledge that their writing reflected and merely extended their exceptional lives. Their example and message gained weight due to the authenticity of their lives.
2. A writer can do whatever he wants with his life if all he does is inform, entertain, or even educate his audience. However, such contradictions cannot be tolerated by the author, who sets out to reform public life through his writing. His influence was ten thousand times greater while he was in prison, and the power of his words and speech significantly increased after he was released than it had been prior to his confinement.
3. After that, he turned his attention to raising people’s political consciousness through the publication of two weekly newspapers, both of which he owned and edited: The Maharatta, published in English, and Kesari, also known as "The Lion", published in Marathi. Tilak became well-known for his harsh criticisms of British rule and of moderate nationalists who advocated social and political reform along Western lines and constitutional lines through those newspapers. He was of the opinion that social reform would only serve to divert attention from the political struggle for independence.

2.

Inference: The newsprint Kesari

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB PGT - 2023,

Answer: D

The inference concerns the newsprint Kesari, and only paragraph 3 mentions it. That paragraph says that Tilak published two weekly newspapers, The Maharatta in English and Kesari, called The Lion, in Marathi.

Paragraph 1 speaks of reformers and their books, and paragraph 2 of a writer's influence in prison, but neither names the paper. So only 3 supports the inference, and the options with 1 or 2 are wrong.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 3 To 3 ] :

Study the given inference that is followed by some paragraphs. You have to find the paragraph(s) from which it is inferred and select the most appropriate option.

1. Until about 1640 BC, Egyptian kings buried their dead in pyramids. In order for a king to be reborn and reunited with his father, the sun god Ra, in paradise after his death, numerous rituals had to be performed. The dead king’s body was first preserved with chemicals and dressed in the finest robes to prepare it for rebirth. After that, a lengthy ceremony took place.
2. The God of embalming is Anubis in Egypt. For burial, Egyptian kings’ bodies were preserved and embalmed. The Egyptians were of the opinion that the procedure would assist them in attaining eternal life. Before being placed inside a coffin, the embalmed body, or mummy, was bandaged and tied like a parcel.
3. A jewel-adorned coffin containing the king’s body was loaded onto a ceremonial boat. A long line of mourners, courtiers, and priests followed his widow and children along the Nile to a temple near the pyramid where he would be buried. The king’s body was laid to rest in a lavishly prepared tomb surrounded by his entire worldly wealth while the mourners feasted. The burial chamber was then sealed deep within the pyramid.

3.

Inference: Egyptian built the pyramids

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB PGT - 2023,

Answer: D

The inference that the Egyptians built the pyramids can be drawn from paragraphs 1 and 3. Paragraph 1 says that until about 1640 BC Egyptian kings buried their dead in pyramids, and paragraph 3 describes a burial in a tomb inside the pyramid with a procession to a temple near it.

Paragraph 2 speaks only of embalming and mummies and has no mention of the pyramids, so the inference cannot be drawn from it. So the answer is only 1 and 3, and the options with paragraph 2 are wrong.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 4 To 4 ] :

Inference: Mountaineering and human evolution

1. Nowadays, mountaineering is regarded as the king of sports. But humans have been living in the mountains since prehistoric times, and in some parts of the world, like the Andes and Himalayas, they have always had to make difficult mountain journeys as part of their daily lives. However, the majority of European cities made it simple to reach some of the peaks there. It's interesting that early climbers chose the easiest routes because the summit was their goal, whereas today's mountaineers prefer difficult routes for the sport's enjoyment.

2. After Edward Whymper's dramatic account of the climb and fatal accident that occurred during the descent of Matterhorn in 1865, popular interest in mountaineering increased significantly. There is absolutely no competition between individuals or teams in the risky sport of mountaineering. Maybe one can say that the opposition is between the group and the actual pinnacles.

3. Because the people in a party rely on each other for their safety, they must climb together as a team. Mountaineering can be dangerous unless reasonable precautions are taken. However, the majority of fatal accidents involve parties who do not have sufficient experience or equipment. Since bad weather is a common cause of accidents, the safest climber knows when to stop, no matter how tempting it may be to keep going and try to reach the top.

4.

Study the given inference that is followed by some paragraphs. You have to find the paragraph(s) from which it is inferred and select the most appropriate option.

Exam Year(s)

DSSSB PGT - 2023,

Answer: A

The inference 'Mountaineering and human evolution' is drawn only from paragraph 1. That paragraph says humans have lived in mountains since prehistoric times and have always made difficult journeys there, and it contrasts early climbers, who took the easiest routes, with today's mountaineers, who prefer difficult ones, which is how the sport has changed over time. Paragraph 2 is about the rise of interest after Whymper's account and the idea of competition, and paragraph 3 is about safety and teamwork, so neither of them concerns the history of mountaineering and human life. So the answer is only 1.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 5 To 10 ] :

In each of the following questions, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. 
Give answer
(a) if only conclusion I follows,
(b) if only conclusion II follows,
(c) if either I or II follows,
(d) if neither I nor II follows,
(e) if both I and II follow

5.

Statement : Company X has marketed the product. Go ahead, purchase it if price and quality are your considerations.

Conclusions :
I. The product must be good in quality.
II. The price of product must be reasonable.

Answer: E

Correct answer: Both I and II follow

The advice is conditional: buy it if price and quality are your considerations. That recommendation only makes sense if the product satisfies both tests.

  • I - follows. Quality is one of the two stated considerations, so the product must meet it.
  • II - follows. Price is the other, so it must be reasonable.

Had the statement mentioned only one of the two, the other conclusion would fail; here the sentence names both.

Please log in or register to report this question.

6.

Statement : The world is neither good nor evil, each man manufactures a world for himself.

Conclusions : 
I. Some people find this world quite good.
II. Some people find this world quite bad.

Answer: E

Correct answer: Both I and II follow

The statement says the world is neither good nor evil and that each man manufactures a world for himself. If the quality of the world is supplied by the individual rather than by the world itself, then individuals must differ in what they make of it.

  • I - follows. Some will manufacture a good world.
  • II - follows. Some will manufacture a bad one.

Note that both conclusions are hedged with some. A conclusion claiming all people find the world good would not follow.

Please log in or register to report this question.

7.

Statement : Good voice is a natural gift but one has to keep practising to improve and excel well in the field of music.

Conclusions : 
I. Natural gifts need nurturing and care.
II. Even though your voice is not good, one can keep practising.

Answer: A

Correct answer: Only conclusion I follows

The statement pairs a gift with an obligation: a good voice is natural, but one has to keep practising to improve and excel.

  • I - follows. That is exactly the point: a natural gift still needs nurturing.
  • II - does not follow. The statement speaks only of someone who already has a good voice. It says nothing about what practice can do for a poor voice, so the extension is the reader’s, not the writer’s.

Please log in or register to report this question.

8.

Statement : All the organised persons find time for rest. Sunita, in-spite of her busy schedule, finds time for rest.

Conclusions :
I. Sunita is an organised person.
II. Sunita is an industrious person.

Answer: E

Correct answer: Neither I nor II follows

The statement gives one direction only: all organised persons find time for rest. It does not say that everyone who finds time for rest is organised, and reversing a universal statement like this is invalid.

  • I - does not follow. Sunita finding time for rest places her in the larger group, not necessarily in the group of organised persons. Compare: all cats are animals, but an animal need not be a cat.
  • II - does not follow. A busy schedule is mentioned, but industriousness is a different quality and is nowhere asserted.

Please log in or register to report this question.

9.

Statement : Until our country achieves economic equality, political freedom and democracy would be meaningless.

Conclusions :
I. Political freedom and democracy go hand in hand.
II. Economic equality leads to real political freedom and democracy.

Answer: B

Correct answer: Only conclusion II follows

Until X, Y would be meaningless makes economic equality the precondition for political freedom and democracy having any real content.

  • II - follows. It restates that precondition: economic equality is what gives political freedom and democracy substance.
  • I - does not follow. The statement mentions freedom and democracy together, but naming two things in one breath is not a claim that they always accompany each other.

Please log in or register to report this question.

10.

Statement : Company X has a record of manufacturing cameras of quality and the latest design so that you do not spoil even a single shot irrespective of the weather conditions.

Conclusions : 

I. No other company except X is reputed in camera industry.
II. Acceptable shot with camera of company X can be taken in any weather conditions.

Answer: B

Correct answer: Only conclusion II follows

The claim made is about company X’s own cameras: quality and latest design, so that no shot is spoilt irrespective of the weather conditions.

  • II - follows. That is a direct restatement - an acceptable shot can be taken in any weather.
  • I - does not follow. Praising one company says nothing about the others. A claim about X is not a claim that X is unique.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Loading…
Tags: Deriving Conclusions from Passages Questions and Answers || Deriving Conclusions from Passages MCQ Questions and Answers || Deriving Conclusions from Passages GK Questions and Answers || Deriving Conclusions from Passages GK MCQ Questions || Deriving Conclusions from Passages Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Deriving Conclusions from Passages GK || GK on Deriving Conclusions from Passages || English Language Questions and Answers || English Language MCQ Questions and Answers || English Language GK Questions and Answers || GK on English Language