Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Reading Comprehension Questions and Answers

Direction for [ Question No: 31 To 32 ] :

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow the passage. Your answer should be based on the passage only.

It has always been clear that a properly designed media programme uses press, posters, printed leaflets, and so on in proportions suitable to the nature of the product itself. In such a programme, television occupies a relatively important place if the product is sold in small quantities. It is regarded as a quick-acting medium, peculiarly suited to promoting 'impulse purchases'. Larger items, such as cars and refrigerators, may be more profitably advertised in the press as they are examined in greater detail and more leisure than television. Nevertheless, in most mass advertising campaigns, the media are used in combination with each other. It is significant, in this connection, that the poster medium, and outdoor advertising generally are now staging something of a recovery, after sustaining what at first looked like a severe blow at the time of introduction of commercial television.

Answer: C

A properly designed media programme uses different sources of media according to the type of the product.

The passage opens by saying that a properly designed programme uses press, posters, printed leaflets and so on in proportions suitable to the nature of the product itself. The mix of media is therefore chosen to fit the product, which is what this option says.

The impulse option picks up only the phrase 'impulse purchases', which the passage ties to television and small items, not to the design of a whole programme. Television for large-scale production reverses the passage, which gives television to goods sold in small quantities. Money to achieve the target is never mentioned.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: B

The producers advertise larger items in the press so that the customer may see details leisurely.

The passage says that larger items, such as cars and refrigerators, may be more profitably advertised in the press as they are examined in greater detail and more leisure than television. A buyer of an expensive item wants to read the details at his own pace, and print allows that.

Substantial profit is only the result the passage mentions in passing and is not the reason given for choosing the press. Television commercials are described as suited to quick, impulse buying of small items, so they do not fit larger ones. Profit through university graduates has no basis in the passage.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 33 To 36 ] :

Read the passage carefully and attempt Question Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4 by choosing the most appropriate option:

We Nigerians, who have been struggling for our rights and have finally achieved them, are correct to forget that a right by itself is incomplete and, in fact, cannot last long if the obligations which accompany that right are absent. We still think too much in terms of rights and privileges and too little in terms of obligations. That weakens a nation and we then become merely decriers and grumble without anything positive to contribute. That applies to the nation as a whole but much more so to the press. The press fought for its own freedom from governmental interference in the old days. Much that appears because of that freedom seems to be exceptionally dangerous. The freedom of the press is an indispensable feature of the democratic process. Undoubtedly, even if the government dislikes the liberties taken by the press and considers them dangerous, it is wrong to obstruct the freedom of press. By imposing restrictions you do not change anything, you merely suppress the public manifestation of certain things, thereby causing the idea and thought underlying them to spread further.

33.

According to the writer, rights cannot last long

Exam Year(s)

HPPSC HPAS - 2021,

Answer: C

Rights cannot last long without the corresponding obligations.

The passage says a right by itself is incomplete and "cannot last long if the obligations which accompany that right are absent". That is option C almost word for word.

The other options bring in ideas the writer never links to the life of a right. Illiteracy is not mentioned. Rights being "imperfect" confuses the writer's point, which is that a right is incomplete without duties, not that the right itself is flawed. Support from the press is mentioned only later, when the writer turns to the press as a whole.

Please log in or register to report this question.

34.

According to the writer, if we think excessively in terms of rights and miserably in terms of obligation

Exam Year(s)

HPPSC HPAS - 2021,

Answer: D

If we think excessively of rights and poorly of obligations, we become critics.

The writer says we think too much of rights and too little of obligations, and that this "weakens a nation" so that "we then become merely decriers and grumble without anything positive to contribute". A decrier is a person who runs things down, that is, a critic.

Achieving our targets and making the nation strong are the opposite of the weakening the writer describes. Becoming slaves of the press is not said anywhere; the press is brought in only as an example of the same fault.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: D

The writer believes that it is wrong to impede the freedom of the press.

The passage says that even if the government dislikes the liberties the press takes and finds them dangerous, "it is wrong to obstruct the freedom of press". To impede and to obstruct mean the same here.

Suppressing the press and controlling ideas are the course the writer argues against. Nothing in the passage says that the Government likes to give the press freedom; it says the opposite, that the government may dislike what the press does with it.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: B

By imposing constraints, we cause the idea and thought to spread.

The passage ends: "By imposing restrictions you do not change anything, you merely suppress the public manifestation of certain things, thereby causing the idea and thought underlying them to spread further."

Restrictions therefore do not change the situation for the better and do not change the society, since they "do not change anything". They do not wipe the idea out either, because the idea is only pushed out of public view and spreads further.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 37 To 37 ] :

“His life was divided between the books, his friends, and long walks. A solitary man, he worked at all hours without much method, and probably courted his fatal illness in this way. To his own name there is not much to show; but such was his liberality that he was continually helping others, and fruits of his erudition are widely scattered, and have gone to increase many a comparative stranger’s reputation.”

(From E.V. Lucas’s “A Funeral”)

Answer: A

The true statement is the solitary man described in the passage is dead.

The passage is in the past tense throughout: his life was divided, he worked at all hours, and he probably courted his fatal illness. An illness described as fatal, and a life that is summed up as over, show that the man has died. The passage comes from an essay titled “A Funeral”, but the question says to use only the passage, and the passage itself already tells us this.

(B) reverses the passage: the man's own name has little to show, and his learning went to raise the reputation of strangers, not the other way round. (C) twists scattered and fruits: the fruits of his erudition are scattered, but nothing says he found joy in it. (D) is not supported: worked at all hours says nothing of a court, and the fatal illness is not placed at any workplace.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 38 To 38 ] :

“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.”

(From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)

Answer: B

The true statement is the wealthier nations are pulling down the crooked streets in their capitals.

The passage says so directly: “Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns”.

Option A misreads the opening: the author wonders why crooked streets are pulled down, and says the streets, not the wondering, are his delight. Option C is not stated; the “islands of the past” are what remains of old streets between the broad ways, not places where crooked streets were built. Option D reverses the argument: the broad ways are what commerce needs, and the author says they can be driven without destroying history, so they are not needed to protect it.

The passage is from an essay by Hilaire Belloc titled “The Crooked Streets”; the collection it appears in could not be confirmed.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 39 To 39 ] :

The World Bank has declared that it does not plan to offer new financing to Sri Lanka, which is battling its worst economic crisis in decades, until the country has an adequate macroeconomic policy framework in place. In a statement, the World Bank said Sri Lanka needed to adopt structural reforms that focus on economic stabilisation and tackle the root causes of its crisis. The latter has starved it of foreign exchange and led to shortages of food, fuel, and medicines. The bank is repurposing resources under existing loans to help alleviate shortages of essential items such as medicine, cooking gas, fertiliser, meals for children, and cash for vulnerable households.

Answer: C

The statement that can be inferred with certainty is that according to the World Bank, Sri Lanka does not yet have an adequate macroeconomic policy framework.

The passage says the Bank will offer no new financing "until the country has an adequate macroeconomic policy framework in place". A refusal that lasts until the framework exists can only be explained if the framework does not exist now, so the claim follows from the text alone.

A reverses the passage: it is the root causes of the crisis that have starved the country of foreign exchange, so the shortage of foreign exchange is an effect, not the root cause. B goes beyond the text: the Bank says Sri Lanka needs structural reforms, but never says that it will advise the government. D contradicts it: the Bank only repurposes resources under existing loans and declines new financing, so no additional funds are promised.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 40 To 40 ] :

"Here, throughout the early 1820s, Stuart continued to fight his losing battle to allow his sepoys to wear their caste-marks and their own choice of facial hair on parade, being again reprimanded by the commander-in-chief. His retort that 'A stronger instance than this of European prejudice with relation to this country has never come under my observations' had no effect on his superiors."

Answer: C

The most accurate statement is that Stuart's 'losing battle' refers to his inability to succeed in enabling sepoys to wear caste-marks.

The paragraph says Stuart 'continued to fight his losing battle to allow his sepoys to wear their caste-marks' and was reprimanded again. A battle he is losing is one he cannot win, which is exactly his failure to get permission for the caste-marks.

The first statement is contradicted by the last sentence: his retort 'had no effect on his superiors', so the commander-in-chief was not moved. The second fails because the reprimands show the Europeans were not accommodating. The fourth fails because Stuart himself calls the ban an instance of European prejudice, and the commander-in-chief, who enforced it, was one of the Europeans; nothing says he was exempt.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Loading…
Tags: Reading Comprehension Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension MCQ Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension GK Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension GK MCQ Questions || Reading Comprehension Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension GK || GK on Reading Comprehension || English Language Questions and Answers || English Language MCQ Questions and Answers || English Language GK Questions and Answers || GK on English Language