Combustor arrangements compared.
| Type | Length and weight | Exit pattern | Ease of development |
|---|---|---|---|
| Can | Greatest | Poorest | Easiest |
| Cannular | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Annular | Least | Best | Hardest |
| Staged annular | Least | Best | Hardest, plus emissions tuning |
What is the consistent trade running down the table?
Answer: C
Every gain in weight, length and exit pattern uniformity costs more in rig testing and instrumentation. A can could be run individually, whereas an annulus must be tested whole, which is a large and unavoidable expense.
Please log in or register to report this question.