Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Capacity to Contract Questions and Answers

Answer: C

The true statement is that a minor's contract cannot be validated even after he attains majority.

In Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903) the Privy Council held that an agreement with a minor is void ab initio under sections 10 and 11 of the Contract Act. Since a void agreement is a nullity, it cannot be ratified when the minor comes of age.

For the same reason it cannot be enforced after majority, the minor is not liable to pay compensation, and the minor need not repay money advanced to him under it; Mohori Bibee also refused to order the minor to refund the mortgage money.

Please log in or register to report this question.

2.

A minor is not competent to enter into a valid contract. A minor may be partner by limited liability. Minor as a party to the agreement the partnership deed is :

Exam Year(s)

MH SET - 2025, SET Exam - 2025,

Answer: B

A partnership deed with a minor as a party is a void contract as to him.

Since Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903), a minor's agreement is void ab initio. Accordingly, Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 provides that a minor cannot be a partner, though he may be admitted to the benefits of partnership with the consent of all the partners, with his liability limited to his share.

The agreement is not voidable, since a void agreement cannot be ratified or avoided, and 'beneficial contract' is not a legal category. Admission to benefits is a status the Act allows, not a contract by the minor.

Please log in or register to report this question.

3.

Claim for necessaries of life supplied to a minor under section 68 of Indian Contract Act

Exam Year(s)

Tripura Public Service Commission - 2019,

Answer: C

The claim can be enforced against the minor's property or estate.

Section 68 of the Indian Contract Act provides that a person who supplies a minor with necessaries suited to his condition in life is entitled to be reimbursed from the minor's property. The liability is of the property, not of the minor.

A minor's agreement is void (Mohori Bibee vs Dharmodas Ghose), so he is not personally liable, even on attaining majority. The guardian is not made liable by Section 68. And because the supplier does have a remedy against the property, 'cannot be enforced at all' is wrong.

Please log in or register to report this question.

4.

Which of the following statements are true ?

(i) Minor's contract can be ratified on attaining majority.
(ii) Minor's contract cannot be ratified on attaining majority.
(iii) Minor's contract can be ratified jointly by both the parties to the contract.
(iv) Minor is not liable under minor's contract.

Exam Year(s)

UGC NET - 2012,

Answer: B

Statements (ii) and (iv) are true, so (B) is correct. In Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903) the Privy Council held that a minor's agreement is absolutely void, which means that it cannot be ratified when he reaches majority, so statement (ii) is true and statement (i) is false. A minor is not personally liable under a contract he makes, so statement (iv) is true. Statement (iii) is false, because a void agreement cannot be ratified by anyone. Options (A), (C) and (D) each contain statement (i) or (iii), which are false.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Loading…

Other Subjects