Intelligent Agents Questions and Answers

Q: Why is it dangerous to conflate the internal utility with the true objective?

A capable optimiser pursues the utility it holds with complete fidelity, so any divergence from what was actually wanted is pursued just as vigorously, and the more capable the agent the more thoroughly it exploits the divergence. Computation cost, documentation and learning are separate issues. That capability amplifies the consequences of a misspecified objective, rather than compensating for it, is the reason the distinction matters increasingly.

Q: What does an agent's internal state summarise?

Internal state is a compression of the percept history that retains what matters for future decisions and discards the rest, which is what makes a model based agent feasible where a table driven one is not. Storing everything is unnecessary, the unobserved environment is by definition not directly available, and goals are held separately. Deciding what to remember is itself a design question, and getting it wrong shows up as an agent that cannot distinguish situations it needs to.

Q: What two models does a model based reflex agent require?

Updating internal state needs a transition model saying how the world changes on its own and how it changes in response to the agent's actions. Together they let the agent maintain a picture of what it cannot currently see. Sensor and actuator models refine the same idea, goals and utilities belong to higher architectures, and other agents are a special case of world evolution. Naming exactly what knowledge an architecture requires shows immediately how much work building one will be.

Q: What does a goal based agent need in addition to a model?

Given a model and a goal, the agent searches or plans over sequences of actions to find one reaching the goal, which makes it flexible when the goal is changed. A utility function is the next step up and handles conflicting or graded objectives. Learning and reflex rules belong to other architectures. Separating the objective from the world knowledge, so that either can be changed without the other, is the structural advance this architecture makes.

Q: When does a goal based agent become inadequate?

A binary goal cannot express that arriving quickly is worth some risk, or that one acceptable outcome is much better than another, so a utility function is needed. Large state spaces, time pressure and sensor noise are handled within either architecture by other means. Recognising that the inadequacy lies in what can be expressed, rather than in what can be computed, identifies which addition is actually required.

Q: What is the principle of maximum expected utility?

The principle weighs each possible outcome by its probability and its utility and selects the action whose average is greatest, which follows from a small set of axioms about consistent preferences. Considering only the most likely outcome ignores rare catastrophes, avoiding bad worst cases is the more conservative minimax criterion, and ignoring probability abandons the uncertainty altogether. A decision rule derivable from axioms about preference is on firmer ground than one adopted by intuition.

Q: Why might an agent not simply maximise expected utility in practice?

The number of outcomes is usually far too large to enumerate, and the probabilities and utilities are themselves estimates, so approximations, sampling and satisficing are used instead. Expected utility applies to sequential problems too, probabilities can often be estimated, and risk attitude is captured within the utility function itself. A normative principle that cannot be computed exactly is still valuable as a target that approximations are measured against.

Q: How is risk aversion represented in a utility framework?

A concave utility means that each additional unit of money or reward is worth less than the last, so a certain amount is preferred to a gamble of the same expected value. That is how risk attitude enters without abandoning expected utility maximisation. Distorting probabilities, adding penalties and refusing uncertainty are ad hoc alternatives that lack the axiomatic justification. Absorbing an apparent departure from the theory into the shape of the utility function keeps the framework intact.

41.

What is the difference between a performance measure and a utility function?

A.One applies to episodic tasks and the other one to sequential tasks
B.One is stated by the designer and the other by the regulator
C.There is no difference; the terms are used interchangeably
D.One judges the agent externally, the other guides it internally

Answer: D

The performance measure is the external standard by which a designer or user judges the agent's behaviour, while the utility function is the internal quantity the agent maximises, and the two coincide only if the design is right. The gap between them is exactly where specification gaming lives. Task type and authorship are not the distinction. Keeping the external criterion and the internal objective conceptually separate is what allows the difference between them to be discussed at all.

Discuss in Forum

42.

Why is it dangerous to conflate the internal utility with the true objective?

A.The agent optimises what it was given, not what was meant
B.Internal utilities are always harder to compute than external ones
C.Regulations require the two to be documented separately
D.The agent cannot learn if the two are treated as the same

Answer: A

A capable optimiser pursues the utility it holds with complete fidelity, so any divergence from what was actually wanted is pursued just as vigorously, and the more capable the agent the more thoroughly it exploits the divergence. Computation cost, documentation and learning are separate issues. That capability amplifies the consequences of a misspecified objective, rather than compensating for it, is the reason the distinction matters increasingly.

Discuss in Forum

43.

What does an agent's internal state summarise?

A.The set of goals the agent is currently attempting to achieve
B.The aspects of history relevant to choosing future actions
C.Every percept the agent has received since it began operating
D.The complete state of the environment including unobserved parts

Answer: B

Internal state is a compression of the percept history that retains what matters for future decisions and discards the rest, which is what makes a model based agent feasible where a table driven one is not. Storing everything is unnecessary, the unobserved environment is by definition not directly available, and goals are held separately. Deciding what to remember is itself a design question, and getting it wrong shows up as an agent that cannot distinguish situations it needs to.

Discuss in Forum

44.

What two models does a model based reflex agent require?

A.A model of its goals and a model of its utility function
B.A model of the environment and a model of all the other agents
C.How the world evolves and how the agent's actions affect it
D.A model of its sensors and a model of its actuators

Answer: C

Updating internal state needs a transition model saying how the world changes on its own and how it changes in response to the agent's actions. Together they let the agent maintain a picture of what it cannot currently see. Sensor and actuator models refine the same idea, goals and utilities belong to higher architectures, and other agents are a special case of world evolution. Naming exactly what knowledge an architecture requires shows immediately how much work building one will be.

Discuss in Forum

45.

What does a goal based agent need in addition to a model?

A.A utility function ranking every possible outcome numerically
B.A learning element that improves its behaviour with experience
C.A set of condition action rules covering every percept it may receive
D.A description of the desired situation and a way to search for it

Answer: D

Given a model and a goal, the agent searches or plans over sequences of actions to find one reaching the goal, which makes it flexible when the goal is changed. A utility function is the next step up and handles conflicting or graded objectives. Learning and reflex rules belong to other architectures. Separating the objective from the world knowledge, so that either can be changed without the other, is the structural advance this architecture makes.

Discuss in Forum

46.

When does a goal based agent become inadequate?

A.When goals conflict or outcomes are uncertain and must be traded off
B.When the environment contains more states than can be enumerated
C.When the agent must act before it has finished searching
D.When the agent's sensors are noisy and its percepts unreliable

Answer: A

A binary goal cannot express that arriving quickly is worth some risk, or that one acceptable outcome is much better than another, so a utility function is needed. Large state spaces, time pressure and sensor noise are handled within either architecture by other means. Recognising that the inadequacy lies in what can be expressed, rather than in what can be computed, identifies which addition is actually required.

Discuss in Forum

47.

What does a utility function let an agent do under uncertainty?

A.Guarantee that it will achieve at least one of its goals
B.Compare outcomes by expected value rather than by possibility
C.Determine which of its percepts are reliable and which are not
D.Reduce the number of states it must consider during search

Answer: B

With probabilities from a model and utilities over outcomes, the agent can compute the expected utility of each action and choose the highest, which is the standard formulation of rational choice under uncertainty. Sensor reliability, search efficiency and guarantees come from elsewhere. Combining a probability distribution with a preference ordering into a single comparable number is what makes decision theory operational, and it is the formal core of the rational agent view.

Discuss in Forum

48.

What is the principle of maximum expected utility?

A.A rational agent avoids any action whose worst outcome is bad
B.A rational agent maximises utility without regard to probability
C.A rational agent chooses the action with the highest expected utility
D.A rational agent maximises the utility of the most likely outcome

Answer: C

The principle weighs each possible outcome by its probability and its utility and selects the action whose average is greatest, which follows from a small set of axioms about consistent preferences. Considering only the most likely outcome ignores rare catastrophes, avoiding bad worst cases is the more conservative minimax criterion, and ignoring probability abandons the uncertainty altogether. A decision rule derivable from axioms about preference is on firmer ground than one adopted by intuition.

Discuss in Forum

49.

Why might an agent not simply maximise expected utility in practice?

A.Expected utility is only defined for episodic environments
B.Probabilities cannot be assigned to outcomes in any real problem
C.Maximising expectation always leads to excessively risky behaviour
D.Computing the expectation over all outcomes may be intractable

Answer: D

The number of outcomes is usually far too large to enumerate, and the probabilities and utilities are themselves estimates, so approximations, sampling and satisficing are used instead. Expected utility applies to sequential problems too, probabilities can often be estimated, and risk attitude is captured within the utility function itself. A normative principle that cannot be computed exactly is still valuable as a target that approximations are measured against.

Discuss in Forum

50.

How is risk aversion represented in a utility framework?

A.By a utility function that is concave in the quantity of interest
B.By reducing every probability estimate towards one half
C.By adding a penalty term to the expected utility calculation
D.By refusing any action whose outcome is not certain

Answer: A

A concave utility means that each additional unit of money or reward is worth less than the last, so a certain amount is preferred to a gamble of the same expected value. That is how risk attitude enters without abandoning expected utility maximisation. Distorting probabilities, adding penalties and refusing uncertainty are ad hoc alternatives that lack the axiomatic justification. Absorbing an apparent departure from the theory into the shape of the utility function keeps the framework intact.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Intelligent Agents Questions and Answers || Intelligent Agents MCQ Questions and Answers || Intelligent Agents GK Questions and Answers || Intelligent Agents GK MCQ Questions || Intelligent Agents Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Intelligent Agents GK || GK on Intelligent Agents || Artificial Intelligence Questions and Answers || Artificial Intelligence MCQ Questions and Answers || Artificial Intelligence GK Questions and Answers || GK on Artificial Intelligence

Intelligent Agents Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications