Knowledge Representation Questions and Answers

Q: What is knowledge representation concerned with?

The subject asks how what a system knows should be written down so that useful conclusions can be drawn from it mechanically. Efficient storage, clear presentation and compression are engineering concerns that a representation may also address but which are not its purpose. Keeping the reasoning requirement at the centre is what distinguishes a knowledge representation from a data format, and it is why formal semantics matters so much here.

Q: Why is a formal semantics necessary for a representation?

Without a semantics two implementations may draw different conclusions from the same diagram, and no error can be identified as such because nothing fixes what was meant. That was the criticism levelled at early semantic networks. Readability, storage and translation are separate benefits. A notation whose meaning is a matter of convention rather than definition cannot be debugged, which is a decisive practical objection rather than a theoretical nicety.

Q: What is an is a link in a semantic network?

The is a link carries both membership and subclass in most early networks, which is exactly the ambiguity that formalisation removed by separating them. Definitions, synonymy and derivation are different relations. A single notation used for two logically distinct relations is convenient until an inference depends on which was meant, at which point the ambiguity becomes a defect rather than a shorthand.

Q: What is a slot in a frame?

Slots hold the values of an object's properties, may carry defaults and may have procedures attached that compute a value when it is needed. A slot value may indeed point at another frame, which is how relations are represented, but that is a use rather than the definition. Gaps and time intervals are different notions. Organising knowledge by object rather than by sentence changes what is convenient without changing what can be expressed.

Q: What is a default value in a frame?

Defaults let a representation say that birds fly without asserting it of every bird, and the value is overridden wherever a more specific fact is available. That is what makes the reasoning non-monotonic. Creation values, statistical modes and immutable values are different notions, the last being the opposite of a default. A value that holds in the absence of information is exactly what a default logic formalises, and frames introduced the idea informally first.

Q: What is procedural attachment in a frame system?

Attaching a procedure to a slot lets a value be computed on demand rather than stored, which handles derived quantities such as an age computed from a birth date. It blurs the line between declarative knowledge and program, which is both its convenience and its weakness. Hierarchy links, editing procedures and consistency checks are different mechanisms. Mixing computation into a declarative representation makes it more useful and considerably harder to reason about formally.

Q: Why is procedural attachment criticised?

Once a conclusion depends on arbitrary code, the declarative reading of the knowledge base is lost and nothing can be inferred about the system without executing it. That sacrifices the auditability which was the point of an explicit representation. Speed, storage and access are practical matters. Recognising that a convenience has cost a system its principal advantage is the kind of judgement that decides whether a feature belongs in a design.

Q: What is a taxonomy?

A taxonomy arranges categories from general to specific, and inheritance down that hierarchy is the principal economy such representations offer. Instance lists, rule classifications and usage rankings are different structures. Whether the hierarchy is asserted by hand or computed from definitions is the difference between a frame system and a description logic, and it determines whether the hierarchy can drift out of step with the definitions.

Q: What is multiple inheritance in a taxonomy?

A category such as amphibious vehicle may specialise both boats and land vehicles, and it then inherits from both, which is convenient until the two supply contradictory defaults. Individuals belonging to several categories is the normal situation rather than multiple inheritance, and the other options describe different structures. A feature that is natural to want and creates ambiguity when exercised is a recurring pattern in inheritance systems.

Q: What ambiguity does multiple inheritance with defaults create?

The classic example makes Nixon a Quaker and a Republican, one supplying a default of pacifist and the other of non-pacifist, with nothing in the representation to adjudicate. Skeptical readings refuse to conclude either, credulous ones pick a consistent extension. Circularity, misplacement and counting are different issues. A representation that admits two equally good conclusions must decide whether to choose or to abstain, and the choice is a design decision rather than a technical one.

61.

What is knowledge representation concerned with?

A.How to encode facts so that a system can reason with them
B.How to store data efficiently on a computer's disk storage
C.How to present information clearly to a human reader of a report
D.How to compress a large body of text into a smaller summary

Answer: A

The subject asks how what a system knows should be written down so that useful conclusions can be drawn from it mechanically. Efficient storage, clear presentation and compression are engineering concerns that a representation may also address but which are not its purpose. Keeping the reasoning requirement at the centre is what distinguishes a knowledge representation from a data format, and it is why formal semantics matters so much here.

Discuss in Forum

62.

Why is a formal semantics necessary for a representation?

A.It allows the representation to be translated into any language
B.It fixes exactly what conclusions the representation licenses
C.It makes the notation easier for a person to read and to write
D.It reduces the amount of storage the representation requires

Answer: B

Without a semantics two implementations may draw different conclusions from the same diagram, and no error can be identified as such because nothing fixes what was meant. That was the criticism levelled at early semantic networks. Readability, storage and translation are separate benefits. A notation whose meaning is a matter of convention rather than definition cannot be debugged, which is a decisive practical objection rather than a theoretical nicety.

Discuss in Forum

63.

What is an is a link in a semantic network?

A.A link joining two concepts that are synonyms of each other
B.A link showing that one concept was derived from another
C.A link asserting membership or subclass relationship
D.A link connecting a concept to its definition in words

Answer: C

The is a link carries both membership and subclass in most early networks, which is exactly the ambiguity that formalisation removed by separating them. Definitions, synonymy and derivation are different relations. A single notation used for two logically distinct relations is convenient until an inference depends on which was meant, at which point the ambiguity becomes a defect rather than a shorthand.

Discuss in Forum

64.

What is a slot in a frame?

A.A gap in the knowledge base awaiting further information
B.A time interval during which the frame is valid
C.A pointer to another frame in the knowledge base
D.A named place holding a property value of the object

Answer: D

Slots hold the values of an object's properties, may carry defaults and may have procedures attached that compute a value when it is needed. A slot value may indeed point at another frame, which is how relations are represented, but that is a use rather than the definition. Gaps and time intervals are different notions. Organising knowledge by object rather than by sentence changes what is convenient without changing what can be expressed.

Discuss in Forum

65.

What is a default value in a frame?

A.A value assumed unless something more specific is known
B.The value the slot had when the frame was first created
C.The value most frequently observed across all instances
D.A value that cannot be overridden by any inheritance

Answer: A

Defaults let a representation say that birds fly without asserting it of every bird, and the value is overridden wherever a more specific fact is available. That is what makes the reasoning non-monotonic. Creation values, statistical modes and immutable values are different notions, the last being the opposite of a default. A value that holds in the absence of information is exactly what a default logic formalises, and frames introduced the idea informally first.

Discuss in Forum

66.

What is procedural attachment in a frame system?

A.A procedure that checks the consistency of the whole system
B.A procedure that computes a slot value when it is required
C.A method for attaching one frame to another in a hierarchy
D.A sequence of steps for adding new frames to the system

Answer: B

Attaching a procedure to a slot lets a value be computed on demand rather than stored, which handles derived quantities such as an age computed from a birth date. It blurs the line between declarative knowledge and program, which is both its convenience and its weakness. Hierarchy links, editing procedures and consistency checks are different mechanisms. Mixing computation into a declarative representation makes it more useful and considerably harder to reason about formally.

Discuss in Forum

67.

Why is procedural attachment criticised?

A.Procedures cannot be stored in the same file as the frames
B.Attached procedures cannot access the values of other slots
C.The system's conclusions depend on code rather than on stated facts
D.Procedures execute too slowly to be used during inference

Answer: C

Once a conclusion depends on arbitrary code, the declarative reading of the knowledge base is lost and nothing can be inferred about the system without executing it. That sacrifices the auditability which was the point of an explicit representation. Speed, storage and access are practical matters. Recognising that a convenience has cost a system its principal advantage is the kind of judgement that decides whether a feature belongs in a design.

Discuss in Forum

68.

What is a taxonomy?

A.A list of every individual known to the system
B.A classification of the inference rules available
C.A ranking of concepts by how often they are used
D.A hierarchy of categories ordered by subclass relations

Answer: D

A taxonomy arranges categories from general to specific, and inheritance down that hierarchy is the principal economy such representations offer. Instance lists, rule classifications and usage rankings are different structures. Whether the hierarchy is asserted by hand or computed from definitions is the difference between a frame system and a description logic, and it determines whether the hierarchy can drift out of step with the definitions.

Discuss in Forum

69.

What is multiple inheritance in a taxonomy?

A.A category having more than one immediate parent
B.A property being inherited by more than one category
C.An individual belonging to more than one category
D.A hierarchy in which every category has several children

Answer: A

A category such as amphibious vehicle may specialise both boats and land vehicles, and it then inherits from both, which is convenient until the two supply contradictory defaults. Individuals belonging to several categories is the normal situation rather than multiple inheritance, and the other options describe different structures. A feature that is natural to want and creates ambiguity when exercised is a recurring pattern in inheritance systems.

Discuss in Forum

70.

What ambiguity does multiple inheritance with defaults create?

A.The number of inherited properties becomes impossible to count
B.Two parents may supply contradictory default values
C.The subclass relation may become circular in the hierarchy
D.The category may be assigned to the wrong parent entirely

Answer: B

The classic example makes Nixon a Quaker and a Republican, one supplying a default of pacifist and the other of non-pacifist, with nothing in the representation to adjudicate. Skeptical readings refuse to conclude either, credulous ones pick a consistent extension. Circularity, misplacement and counting are different issues. A representation that admits two equally good conclusions must decide whether to choose or to abstain, and the choice is a design decision rather than a technical one.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Knowledge Representation Questions and Answers || Knowledge Representation MCQ Questions and Answers || Knowledge Representation GK Questions and Answers || Knowledge Representation GK MCQ Questions || Knowledge Representation Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Knowledge Representation GK || GK on Knowledge Representation || Artificial Intelligence Questions and Answers || Artificial Intelligence MCQ Questions and Answers || Artificial Intelligence GK Questions and Answers || GK on Artificial Intelligence

Knowledge Representation Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications