Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Fundamental Rights Questions and Answers

31.

When the court declare that certain provisions of the Act as invalid, it does not affect the validity of the Act and it remains as it is. The principle is known as :

Exam Year(s)

UGC NET - 2012,

Answer: B

When a court declares some provisions of an Act invalid but the rest of the Act can stand on its own, the Act as a whole remains in force. This is the doctrine of severability, which asks whether the valid part can be separated from the invalid part. The doctrine of prospective overruling limits the effect of a changed ruling to the future, the doctrine of pleasure governs how long public servants hold office under the Crown, and the doctrine of eclipse deals with a pre-Constitution law that is overshadowed by a fundamental right and revives when the obstacle is removed. The answer is the doctrine of severability.

Please log in or register to report this question.

32.

Which one of the following cases is not related to the doctrine of severability ?

Exam Year(s)

UGC NET - 2013,

Answer: C

Among the cases listed, Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India is the one the key treats as not related to the doctrine of severability. It is known as the case on the basic structure and on the harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, where parts of the 42nd Amendment were struck down. A.K. Gopalan, R.M.D.C. and Kihoto Hollohan are the cases usually cited when courts separate the invalid part of a statute or amendment from the valid part and uphold the rest. So option C is the answer.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Loading…

Other Subjects