Superconductivity Questions and Answers

Q: At \(T = 0\) K, which of the following diagram represents the occupation probability \(P(E)\) of energy states of electrons in a BCS type superconductor?

The correct diagram is (A): \(P(E)\) is 1 well below \(E_{F}\) and falls smoothly to 0 across \(E_{F}\).In the BCS ground state, electrons pair up and the occupation of a state of energy \(\xi\) measured from \(E_{F}\) is\[ \begin{aligned} v_{k}^{2} &= \frac{1}{2}\left(1 - \frac{\xi}{E}\right), \\ E &= \sqrt{\xi^{2} + \Delta^{2}} \end{aligned} \]Even at \(T = 0\) this goes smoothly from 1 to 0 over an energy range of order the gap \(\Delta\), passing through \(\frac{1}{2}\) at \(E_{F}\). It looks like a Fermi function at finite temperature, though its origin is pairing, not thermal excitation.The sharp step (B) is a normal metal at \(T = 0\). The rising curve (C) is inverted, giving occupied states above \(E_{F}\) and empty ones below, and the peak (D) would leave deep states unoccupied.

Q: Superconductors are perfect diamagnets with susceptibility χ in CGS units to be :

The susceptibility is \( -1/4\pi \) in CGS units.The Meissner effect expels the field, so inside the superconductor \( B = 0 \). In CGS units \( B = H + 4\pi M \), so\[ \begin{aligned} H + 4\pi M &= 0 \\ \chi = \frac{M}{H} &= -\frac{1}{4\pi} \end{aligned} \](In SI the same perfect diamagnetism is \( \chi = -1 \).) \( 10^{-6} \) and \( 10^{6} \) are positive, the sign of paramagnetic materials, and \( 4\pi \) has the wrong sign and size.

Q: A flux quantum (fluxoid) is approximately equal to 2 × 10\(^{-7}\) gauss-cm\(^{2}\). A type II superconductor is placed in a small magnetic field, which is then slowly increased till the field starts penetrating the superconductor. The strength of the field at this point is (2/\(\pi\)) × 10\(^{5}\) gauss. The penetration depth of this superconductor is :

The penetration depth is 100 Å.The field at which flux first penetrates is the lower critical field, estimated in the question's model as one flux quantum spread over an area of about \(\pi\lambda^{2}\):\[ \begin{aligned} H_{c1} &\approx \frac{\Phi_{0}}{\pi\lambda^{2}} \\ \lambda^{2} &= \frac{\Phi_{0}}{\pi H_{c1}} \end{aligned} \]\[ \begin{aligned} \lambda^{2} &= \frac{2 \times 10^{-7}}{\pi \times (2/\pi) \times 10^{5}} \\ &= 10^{-12}\ \text{cm}^{2} \end{aligned} \]so \(\lambda = 10^{-6}\) cm = 100 Å. The factor \(2/\pi\) in the field is chosen to cancel the \(\pi\), which shows this is the intended relation.

Q: Considering the BCS theory of superconductivity, which one of the following statements is not correct ?

The incorrect statement is that flux is quantized in units of h/e.In BCS theory the charge carriers are Cooper pairs of charge 2e, so the magnetic flux through a superconducting ring is quantized in units of\[ \begin{aligned} \Phi_{0} &= \frac{h}{2e} \\ &\approx 2.07 \times 10^{-15}\ \text{Wb} \end{aligned} \]The experiments of Deaver and Fairbank and of Doll and Nabauer (1961) confirmed the factor 2. The other statements are consistent with BCS theory: it predicts an energy gap below \(T_{c}\); the isotope effect, \(T_{c} \propto M^{-1/2}\), follows from electron-phonon pairing, so different isotopes have different \(T_{c}\); and the Meissner effect is observed and accounted for.

At \(T = 0\) K, which of the following diagram represents the occupation probability \(P(E)\) of energy states of electrons in a BCS type superconductor?

Exam Year(s)

GATE Physics - 2022,

Answer: A

The correct diagram is (A): \(P(E)\) is 1 well below \(E_{F}\) and falls smoothly to 0 across \(E_{F}\).

In the BCS ground state, electrons pair up and the occupation of a state of energy \(\xi\) measured from \(E_{F}\) is

\[ \begin{aligned} v_{k}^{2} &= \frac{1}{2}\left(1 - \frac{\xi}{E}\right), \\ E &= \sqrt{\xi^{2} + \Delta^{2}} \end{aligned} \]

Even at \(T = 0\) this goes smoothly from 1 to 0 over an energy range of order the gap \(\Delta\), passing through \(\frac{1}{2}\) at \(E_{F}\). It looks like a Fermi function at finite temperature, though its origin is pairing, not thermal excitation.

The sharp step (B) is a normal metal at \(T = 0\). The rising curve (C) is inverted, giving occupied states above \(E_{F}\) and empty ones below, and the peak (D) would leave deep states unoccupied.

Discuss in Forum

Superconductors are perfect diamagnets with susceptibility χ in CGS units to be :

A.\( -1/4\pi \)
B.\( 10^{-6} \)
C.\( 10^{6} \)
D.\( 4\pi \)

Exam Year(s)

MH SET - 2018, SET Exam - 2018,

Answer: A

The susceptibility is \( -1/4\pi \) in CGS units.

The Meissner effect expels the field, so inside the superconductor \( B = 0 \). In CGS units \( B = H + 4\pi M \), so

\[ \begin{aligned} H + 4\pi M &= 0 \\ \chi = \frac{M}{H} &= -\frac{1}{4\pi} \end{aligned} \]

(In SI the same perfect diamagnetism is \( \chi = -1 \).) \( 10^{-6} \) and \( 10^{6} \) are positive, the sign of paramagnetic materials, and \( 4\pi \) has the wrong sign and size.

Discuss in Forum

A flux quantum (fluxoid) is approximately equal to 2 × 10\(^{-7}\) gauss-cm\(^{2}\). A type II superconductor is placed in a small magnetic field, which is then slowly increased till the field starts penetrating the superconductor. The strength of the field at this point is (2/\(\pi\)) × 10\(^{5}\) gauss. The penetration depth of this superconductor is :

A.10 Å
B.100 Å
C.1000 Å
D.1200 Å

Exam Year(s)

MH SET - 2019, MH SET - 2020, SET Exam - 2019, SET Exam - 2020,

Answer: B

The penetration depth is 100 Å.

The field at which flux first penetrates is the lower critical field, estimated in the question's model as one flux quantum spread over an area of about \(\pi\lambda^{2}\):

\[ \begin{aligned} H_{c1} &\approx \frac{\Phi_{0}}{\pi\lambda^{2}} \\ \lambda^{2} &= \frac{\Phi_{0}}{\pi H_{c1}} \end{aligned} \]

\[ \begin{aligned} \lambda^{2} &= \frac{2 \times 10^{-7}}{\pi \times (2/\pi) \times 10^{5}} \\ &= 10^{-12}\ \text{cm}^{2} \end{aligned} \]

so \(\lambda = 10^{-6}\) cm = 100 Å. The factor \(2/\pi\) in the field is chosen to cancel the \(\pi\), which shows this is the intended relation.

Discuss in Forum

Considering the BCS theory of superconductivity, which one of the following statements is not correct ?

A.Presence of energy gap at temperature below the critical temperature
B.Different critical temperatures are possible for isotopes
C.Presence of Meissner effect can be observed
D.Quantization of magnetic flux in superconducting ring in the units of (h/e)

Exam Year(s)

MH SET - 2020, SET Exam - 2020,

Answer: D

The incorrect statement is that flux is quantized in units of h/e.

In BCS theory the charge carriers are Cooper pairs of charge 2e, so the magnetic flux through a superconducting ring is quantized in units of

\[ \begin{aligned} \Phi_{0} &= \frac{h}{2e} \\ &\approx 2.07 \times 10^{-15}\ \text{Wb} \end{aligned} \]

The experiments of Deaver and Fairbank and of Doll and Nabauer (1961) confirmed the factor 2. The other statements are consistent with BCS theory: it predicts an energy gap below \(T_{c}\); the isotope effect, \(T_{c} \propto M^{-1/2}\), follows from electron-phonon pairing, so different isotopes have different \(T_{c}\); and the Meissner effect is observed and accounted for.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Superconductivity Questions and Answers || Superconductivity MCQ Questions and Answers || Superconductivity GK Questions and Answers || Superconductivity GK MCQ Questions || Superconductivity Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Superconductivity GK || GK on Superconductivity || Solid State Physics Questions and Answers || Solid State Physics MCQ Questions and Answers || Solid State Physics GK Questions and Answers || GK on Solid State Physics

Superconductivity Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications