Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Restitution and Judicial Separation Questions and Answers

1.

Which of the following is not a valid defence available to wife in a suit for restitution of conjugal rights ?

Exam Year(s)

MH SET - 2020, SET Exam - 2020,

Answer: D

The option that is not a valid defence is that the husband is living with his parents.

A wife can resist a suit for restitution of conjugal rights by showing a reasonable excuse for living apart: cruelty making it unsafe to live with the husband, his gross neglect of marital obligations, or a defect in the marriage itself, such as its being irregular or void. These are recognised defences.

The mere fact that the husband lives in a joint family with his parents is not a reasonable excuse; courts have held that a wife's insistence on a separate home, without more, does not justify withdrawing from his society.

Please log in or register to report this question.

2.

In which of the following case the Court held that Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act was Constitutionally violative of right to Human dignity and privacy ?

Exam Year(s)

UGC NET - 2012,

Answer: B

The court held Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act unconstitutional, as violating the right to human dignity and privacy, in T. Sareetha v. T. Venkata Subbaiah (1983), a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court by Justice Choudary, option B. Later the Delhi High Court in Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh took the opposite view, and the Supreme Court in Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar upheld Section 9. Bipin Chandra v. Prabhavati (A) and Lachman v. Meena (C) are not the case in the key, so B is the answer.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Loading…

Other Subjects