Aperture Antennas Questions and Answers

Q: What is spillover in a reflector antenna?

Spillover is the portion of the feed pattern that passes beyond the edge of the reflector and is lost, or worse, arrives as a side lobe pointing at warm ground. Illuminating the edge weakly reduces it but worsens the taper efficiency, so an optimum edge taper of about ten decibels is usual. Panel leakage, coverage footprint and strut scattering are all real effects but are separately named. The taper against spillover trade is the central compromise in feed design.

Q: Why is an edge taper of about ten decibels commonly chosen for a reflector feed?

Illuminating the rim ten decibels below the centre keeps most of the feed power on the reflector while still using the outer area reasonably, and the product of the two efficiencies peaks near that value. A stronger taper wastes aperture and a weaker one wastes power past the edge. Side lobes fall as the taper increases, so the minimum is not at ten decibels, and impedance matching and horn capability are unrelated. Optimising a product of two competing efficiencies is a pattern that recurs throughout antenna engineering.

Q: What does the Ruze equation describe?

Ruze relates the root mean square surface error, measured in wavelengths, to the gain lost and the scattered power that appears in the side lobes. An error of a sixteenth of a wavelength costs about a decibel, which is the usual manufacturing criterion. The other options describe beamwidth scaling, feed positioning and bandwidth, all of which are governed by different relations. Ruze is what turns a mechanical tolerance into an electrical specification, and it is why the same dish is excellent at one frequency and useless at ten times it.

Q: Why does the same reflector perform worse at higher frequency?

A fixed mechanical error is a larger fraction of the wavelength at higher frequency, so the phase errors across the aperture grow and the Ruze loss rises rapidly. The physical area is unchanged and the gain would otherwise rise as the square of frequency, which is precisely why the surface eventually becomes the limitation. Feed size falls rather than rises with frequency, and atmospheric absorption is a propagation matter outside the antenna. Surface tolerance is what sets the upper frequency limit of any reflector.

Q: What is aperture blockage?

In a prime focus or Cassegrain geometry the feed, subreflector and struts sit in the path of the reflected wave, removing power from the aperture and scattering it into the side lobes. The loss goes roughly as the square of the blocked fraction of the diameter, and the side lobe damage is often the more serious. Offset geometries avoid it entirely. Far field obstacles are a propagation problem, and deliberate masking is a synthesis technique of quite another kind.

Q: Why do the struts supporting a feed raise the side lobes as well as reducing gain?

A strut in the aperture intercepts and re-radiates energy in a pattern of its own, typically producing a set of lobes along the plane of the strut, which is why struts are often shaped or tilted to direct that scattering harmlessly. Mechanical deflection is a separate concern addressed by structural design, the struts are not resonant elements, and the shadow they cast is the blockage rather than the scattering. Both effects arise from the same obstruction but they are counted separately in an efficiency budget.

Q: What is the chief advantage of an offset fed reflector geometry?

Moving the feed out of the reflected beam eliminates both the blockage loss and the strut scattering, giving higher efficiency and much lower side lobes, which is why domestic satellite dishes are almost universally offset. The costs are a harder surface to make, a bulkier mount and a cross polarisation penalty from the asymmetry. Bandwidth is set by the feed, and polarisation by the feed as well. The geometry is a good example of an electrical gain bought with mechanical complexity.

Q: What does Babinet's principle relate?

Babinet's principle, in its antenna form, states that a slot cut in a conducting sheet and the metal strip that would exactly fill it have complementary patterns, with the electric and magnetic fields interchanged. It gives the slot's impedance directly from the dipole's, and its polarisation is rotated ninety degrees. Reflector and lens equivalence, waveguide mode coupling and reciprocity are all different results. The principle is what makes slots analysable without any fresh calculation.

Q: Babinet gives slot impedance as \( Z_{s} = \eta^{2}/4Z_{d} \). What is it for a dipole impedance of 73 ohms?

Taking the intrinsic impedance of free space as 377 ohms:\[ Z_{s} = \tfrac{377^{2}}{4 \times 73} \approx 486 \]giving about 486 ohms, which is why a centre fed half wave slot is a high impedance load and is usually fed off centre to bring it down. The relation converts every known dipole result into a slot result at once, which is the practical value of a duality theorem and the reason slots need almost no separate theory of their own.

11.

What is spillover in a reflector antenna?

A.The part of the beam that falls outside the intended coverage area on the ground
B.Radiation that is scattered by the struts supporting the feed at the focus
C.Feed radiation that misses the reflector entirely
D.Power that leaks through small gaps in the reflector surface panels

Answer: C

Spillover is the portion of the feed pattern that passes beyond the edge of the reflector and is lost, or worse, arrives as a side lobe pointing at warm ground. Illuminating the edge weakly reduces it but worsens the taper efficiency, so an optimum edge taper of about ten decibels is usual. Panel leakage, coverage footprint and strut scattering are all real effects but are separately named. The taper against spillover trade is the central compromise in feed design.

Discuss in Forum

12.

Why is an edge taper of about ten decibels commonly chosen for a reflector feed?

A.It gives the lowest possible side lobe level that a reflector can achieve
B.It matches the impedance of the feed horn to the free space wave impedance
C.It is the largest taper that the feed horn can physically be made to produce
D.It balances taper loss against spillover loss

Answer: D

Illuminating the rim ten decibels below the centre keeps most of the feed power on the reflector while still using the outer area reasonably, and the product of the two efficiencies peaks near that value. A stronger taper wastes aperture and a weaker one wastes power past the edge. Side lobes fall as the taper increases, so the minimum is not at ten decibels, and impedance matching and horn capability are unrelated. Optimising a product of two competing efficiencies is a pattern that recurs throughout antenna engineering.

Discuss in Forum

13.

What does the Ruze equation describe?

A.Gain loss caused by random surface errors on a reflector
B.The relationship between aperture size and the half power beamwidth achieved
C.The variation of feed impedance with the position of the feed relative to focus
D.The bandwidth available from a reflector of a given focal length to diameter ratio

Answer: A

Ruze relates the root mean square surface error, measured in wavelengths, to the gain lost and the scattered power that appears in the side lobes. An error of a sixteenth of a wavelength costs about a decibel, which is the usual manufacturing criterion. The other options describe beamwidth scaling, feed positioning and bandwidth, all of which are governed by different relations. Ruze is what turns a mechanical tolerance into an electrical specification, and it is why the same dish is excellent at one frequency and useless at ten times it.

Discuss in Forum

14.

A reflector has an rms surface error of \( \lambda/16 \). Roughly what gain loss does Ruze predict?

A.About 6 dB, which is why tolerances are so tight
B.About 1 dB
C.About 3 dB
D.About 0.1 dB

Answer: B

The Ruze exponent is proportional to the square of the error in wavelengths, and the standard result for a sixteenth of a wavelength is:

\[ \Delta G \approx 1 \text{ dB} \]

so about 1 dB is lost. Because the exponent goes as the square of the error measured in wavelengths, halving the wavelength quadruples the exponent, and a surface good for one band may be hopeless an octave higher. This is the calculation that decides the highest frequency at which an existing dish can usefully be operated.

Discuss in Forum

15.

Why does the same reflector perform worse at higher frequency?

A.The feed horn becomes physically too large to fit at the focal point
B.Atmospheric absorption increases and reduces the signal reaching the aperture
C.Its surface error becomes a larger fraction of a wavelength
D.Its physical area becomes smaller relative to the wave being received

Answer: C

A fixed mechanical error is a larger fraction of the wavelength at higher frequency, so the phase errors across the aperture grow and the Ruze loss rises rapidly. The physical area is unchanged and the gain would otherwise rise as the square of frequency, which is precisely why the surface eventually becomes the limitation. Feed size falls rather than rises with frequency, and atmospheric absorption is a propagation matter outside the antenna. Surface tolerance is what sets the upper frequency limit of any reflector.

Discuss in Forum

16.

What is aperture blockage?

A.The reduction in aperture area caused by the rim of the reflector being curved
B.The loss of signal when an obstacle stands in the far field of the antenna
C.The deliberate masking of part of an aperture to shape the radiation pattern
D.Obstruction of the aperture by the feed and its supports

Answer: D

In a prime focus or Cassegrain geometry the feed, subreflector and struts sit in the path of the reflected wave, removing power from the aperture and scattering it into the side lobes. The loss goes roughly as the square of the blocked fraction of the diameter, and the side lobe damage is often the more serious. Offset geometries avoid it entirely. Far field obstacles are a propagation problem, and deliberate masking is a synthesis technique of quite another kind.

Discuss in Forum

17.

Why do the struts supporting a feed raise the side lobes as well as reducing gain?

A.They scatter energy into directions away from the main beam
B.They add weight that deflects the reflector surface out of its correct shape
C.They act as parasitic elements resonating at the operating frequency of the dish
D.They reduce the illumination of the outer part of the reflector behind them

Answer: A

A strut in the aperture intercepts and re-radiates energy in a pattern of its own, typically producing a set of lobes along the plane of the strut, which is why struts are often shaped or tilted to direct that scattering harmlessly. Mechanical deflection is a separate concern addressed by structural design, the struts are not resonant elements, and the shadow they cast is the blockage rather than the scattering. Both effects arise from the same obstruction but they are counted separately in an efficiency budget.

Discuss in Forum

18.

What is the chief advantage of an offset fed reflector geometry?

A.It produces circular polarisation without any additional feed hardware
B.It removes aperture blockage completely
C.It gives a wider bandwidth than a symmetric reflector of the same diameter
D.It is much cheaper to manufacture than a symmetric parabolic reflector

Answer: B

Moving the feed out of the reflected beam eliminates both the blockage loss and the strut scattering, giving higher efficiency and much lower side lobes, which is why domestic satellite dishes are almost universally offset. The costs are a harder surface to make, a bulkier mount and a cross polarisation penalty from the asymmetry. Bandwidth is set by the feed, and polarisation by the feed as well. The geometry is a good example of an electrical gain bought with mechanical complexity.

Discuss in Forum

19.

What does Babinet's principle relate?

A.An aperture in a waveguide wall to the mode travelling inside the guide itself
B.A transmitting antenna to the same antenna operating in the receiving condition
C.A slot antenna to its complementary dipole
D.A reflector antenna to the lens that would give the same aperture distribution

Answer: C

Babinet's principle, in its antenna form, states that a slot cut in a conducting sheet and the metal strip that would exactly fill it have complementary patterns, with the electric and magnetic fields interchanged. It gives the slot's impedance directly from the dipole's, and its polarisation is rotated ninety degrees. Reflector and lens equivalence, waveguide mode coupling and reciprocity are all different results. The principle is what makes slots analysable without any fresh calculation.

Discuss in Forum

20.

Babinet gives slot impedance as \( Z_{s} = \eta^{2}/4Z_{d} \). What is it for a dipole impedance of 73 ohms?

A.About 73 ohms
B.About 292 ohms
C.About 36.5 ohms, half the dipole value
D.About 486 ohms

Answer: D

Taking the intrinsic impedance of free space as 377 ohms:

\[ Z_{s} = \tfrac{377^{2}}{4 \times 73} \approx 486 \]

giving about 486 ohms, which is why a centre fed half wave slot is a high impedance load and is usually fed off centre to bring it down. The relation converts every known dipole result into a slot result at once, which is the practical value of a duality theorem and the reason slots need almost no separate theory of their own.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Aperture Antennas Questions and Answers || Aperture Antennas MCQ Questions and Answers || Aperture Antennas GK Questions and Answers || Aperture Antennas GK MCQ Questions || Aperture Antennas Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Aperture Antennas GK || GK on Aperture Antennas || Antenna and Wave Propagation Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation MCQ Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation GK Questions and Answers || GK on Antenna and Wave Propagation

Aperture Antennas Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications