Spectrophotometry Fundamentals Questions and Answers

Answer: A

As the transmitted light falls towards the stray light level, the two become comparable and the measured transmittance is dominated by light the sample never absorbed, so the curve bends towards the concentration axis well before the theoretical limit. Detector response is linear in intensity, fluorescence is a separate problem, and drift is corrected by a double-beam arrangement. A floor set by an additive error always compresses readings that approach it, whatever the measurement.

Answer: B

A silicon photodiode is cheap, rugged, linear and sensitive enough across the visible, which is why it dominates routine instruments. A photomultiplier is used where the highest sensitivity is needed, thermocouples belong to the infrared where photon detectors are poor, and a hollow cathode lamp is a source rather than a detector. Matching the detector to the wavelength range and the sensitivity required is what decides between them. The shared properties explain why these belong to one family, and the differences explain why more than one exists.

Answer: C

A double-beam arrangement splits the light and passes half through the sample and half through a reference, comparing them continuously, so drift in the source or the detector affects both paths equally and cancels. Wavelength comparison, dual detectors and time comparison describe other techniques. Measuring a ratio rather than an absolute value is what makes an instrument immune to the drift of everything common to the two paths. A single measurement chosen to respond to the one asymmetry beats several that respond to shared behaviour.

Answer: D

With one path only, the blank must be measured and the instrument zeroed at every wavelength before the sample is read, since the source output and detector response vary across the spectrum. Reference cells, choppers and paired detectors belong to the double-beam arrangement. That a single-beam instrument is cheaper but demands more of the operator, and drifts between the blank and the sample reading, is the trade between the two designs. Checking the units of each quantity catches a wrong formula before the arithmetic begins.

Answer: A

A blank contains everything the sample does except the analyte, so subtracting its reading removes the contribution of solvent, cell walls and reagents. Lamp drift is what a double beam corrects, and neither non-linearity nor stray light is addressed by a blank. Measuring what everything except the quantity of interest contributes, and subtracting it, is the most general technique in analytical measurement and appears under many names. Most errors here come from carrying a result across from a neighbouring case where it does not hold.

Answer: B

Any difference in wall thickness, glass quality or surface finish appears in the comparison as an apparent absorbance that has nothing to do with the sample. Path length does matter but through the Beer-Lambert law rather than the wavelength, focus is unaffected, and volume is irrelevant to the measurement. Cells are sold in matched sets and marked so they are always inserted the same way round, which is a discipline worth keeping. Reading the definition literally, rather than recalling a formula, is the reliable route through questions of this shape.

Answer: C

Several standards across the range show whether the response really is a straight line through the origin, and where it begins to bend. A single point assumes linearity without testing it. It takes longer rather than less time, a blank is still needed, and stray light is not compensated. A calibration that tests its own assumption is worth the extra work, and it is what reveals the concentration range over which a result can be trusted. The quantity that varies and the quantity that does not are worth naming before any substitution is attempted.

Answer: D

A matrix effect is anything else in the sample changing the analyte's absorptivity or the measurement, so a standard in pure solvent no longer calibrates it correctly. Cell absorption and detector response are instrument properties, and scattering is a separate interference. The remedy is to match the standards' matrix to the sample's, or to use standard additions, which calibrates within the sample itself and so sidesteps the problem entirely. Working one numerical case through both cases side by side fixes the distinction better than any rule of thumb.

Answer: A

Adding known amounts of analyte to portions of the sample itself produces a calibration whose matrix is identical to the sample's, so any matrix effect applies equally to standards and sample and cancels. It takes considerably longer, still needs a blank, and does nothing for stray light. Calibrating within the thing being measured, rather than against an external standard, is the general answer whenever the surroundings affect the measurement. The quantity that varies and the quantity that does not are worth naming before any substitution is attempted.

Answer: B

The relative error curve has a broad minimum near an absorbance of about 0.4, where a given uncertainty in transmittance translates into the smallest relative uncertainty in concentration. Very low absorbance means a small difference between two large numbers, and very high absorbance means measuring a tiny transmitted signal. Working in the range from about 0.2 to 0.8 is standard practice, and diluting or changing the cell length is how a reading is brought into it.