Microstrip Antennas Questions and Answers

Q: What does absorber placed around a patch under test achieve?

Absorber at the board edge attenuates the surface and creeping waves before they can diffract, so the measured pattern is closer to that of an infinite ground plane. It costs a little gain rather than adding any. Chamber wall reflections are dealt with by absorber on the walls, and thermal management is not a pattern measurement concern. Treating the antenna's own structure as a source of unwanted radiation, and absorbing it, is a standard measurement technique.

Q: Why is a patch antenna's efficiency hard to measure directly?

An impedance measurement cannot distinguish power that has been radiated from power that has been dissipated, since both leave the input port and neither returns. Efficiency is therefore obtained by comparing measured gain with computed directivity, or by a reverberation chamber or Wheeler cap measurement. Signal level is ample, efficiency is a scalar property rather than a directional one, and connector loss is calibrated in the usual way. A quantity that cannot be measured at one port needs a method that looks at both.

Q: What is a Wheeler cap measurement used for?

Enclosing the antenna in a conducting cap suppresses radiation while leaving the ohmic losses unchanged, so comparing the input resistance with and without the cap separates the two. It is the classical way of measuring the efficiency of an electrically small antenna. Patterns cannot be measured inside a cap, resonance is found from the impedance sweep, and polarisation needs a far field measurement. Suppressing one loss mechanism to measure the other by difference is an elegant and widely applicable idea.

Q: Why does the Wheeler cap method suit electrically small antennas particularly?

For a small antenna the two resistances are of the same order, so the difference the cap reveals is a large and well measured fraction of the total. For an efficient antenna the difference would be a small residue between two nearly equal numbers and the method would be imprecise. Physical size, bandwidth and pattern breadth are practical conveniences rather than the reason. A differential method works best when the difference being measured is not a small remainder.

Q: What does a reverberation chamber measure for an antenna?

A stirred reflective chamber creates a statistically uniform field, so the received or radiated power can be integrated over all directions and polarisations without measuring the pattern at all. That gives total radiated power and, with the input power, the efficiency. Pattern and impedance are measured by other means, and polarisation information is deliberately averaged away, which is exactly what makes the measurement fast and pattern independent.

Q: Why is total radiated power a useful figure for a handset antenna?

Since a phone is held at arbitrary angles against a head and hand, no single direction of the pattern characterises it usefully, and the power summed over all directions is what predicts performance. Network operators specify it for that reason. Regulators specify emissions and exposure rather than patterns, handset patterns are routinely measured, and a closed case presents no obstacle to a pattern measurement. Choosing a figure of merit that matches how the device is actually used is the point.

Q: What is specific absorption rate?

Specific absorption rate measures how much radiofrequency power is deposited per kilogram of tissue, and exposure limits are written in those terms. Handset antennas are designed and placed to keep it within the limit, which sometimes conflicts with radiation efficiency. Moisture uptake, conductor loss and receiving aperture are quite different quantities. A regulatory limit expressed in terms of an effect on the user, rather than on the equipment, constrains design in ways that purely electrical specifications do not.

Q: Why is the antenna often placed at the bottom of a mobile handset?

Distance from the head reduces the specific absorption rate and the detuning that tissue proximity causes, at the cost of the hand gripping that end. It is a compromise between two absorbers rather than an escape from either. Board width, battery placement and available volume all influence the layout but none is the governing reason. Where an antenna is placed inside a product is usually decided by the human body rather than by electromagnetics alone.

91.

Why is a patch antenna's measured pattern rippled at wide angles?

A.Higher order modes excited in the patch at large observation angles
B.The measurement range being shorter than the far field distance
C.Diffraction from the edges of the finite ground plane
D.Reflections from the connector on the underside of the board

Answer: C

The direct radiation and the contribution diffracted from the board edge arrive with a path difference that varies with angle, so they alternately add and cancel and the pattern ripples, most noticeably towards the horizon and behind. A larger or absorber lined ground plane smooths it. Connector reflection, mode excitation and range length can all degrade a measurement but produce different signatures. Recognising a ripple as an interference effect points straight at a second path.

Discuss in Forum

92.

What does absorber placed around a patch under test achieve?

A.It increases the measured gain by preventing power from escaping sideways
B.It shields the antenna from reflections arriving from the chamber walls
C.It cools the antenna during high power measurements on the range
D.It suppresses the edge diffraction that ripples the pattern

Answer: D

Absorber at the board edge attenuates the surface and creeping waves before they can diffract, so the measured pattern is closer to that of an infinite ground plane. It costs a little gain rather than adding any. Chamber wall reflections are dealt with by absorber on the walls, and thermal management is not a pattern measurement concern. Treating the antenna's own structure as a source of unwanted radiation, and absorbing it, is a standard measurement technique.

Discuss in Forum

93.

Why is a patch antenna's efficiency hard to measure directly?

A.Losses in the substrate cannot be separated from radiation by an input measurement
B.The antenna radiates too little power for a receiver to detect reliably
C.The efficiency changes with the direction in which the antenna is pointed
D.The feed connector contributes a loss that cannot be calibrated out at all

Answer: A

An impedance measurement cannot distinguish power that has been radiated from power that has been dissipated, since both leave the input port and neither returns. Efficiency is therefore obtained by comparing measured gain with computed directivity, or by a reverberation chamber or Wheeler cap measurement. Signal level is ample, efficiency is a scalar property rather than a directional one, and connector loss is calibrated in the usual way. A quantity that cannot be measured at one port needs a method that looks at both.

Discuss in Forum

94.

What is a Wheeler cap measurement used for?

A.Checking the polarisation purity of a circularly polarised patch element
B.Separating radiation loss from ohmic loss in a small antenna
C.Measuring the pattern of an antenna inside a small shielded enclosure
D.Determining the resonant frequency of an antenna without a network analyser

Answer: B

Enclosing the antenna in a conducting cap suppresses radiation while leaving the ohmic losses unchanged, so comparing the input resistance with and without the cap separates the two. It is the classical way of measuring the efficiency of an electrically small antenna. Patterns cannot be measured inside a cap, resonance is found from the impedance sweep, and polarisation needs a far field measurement. Suppressing one loss mechanism to measure the other by difference is an elegant and widely applicable idea.

Discuss in Forum

95.

Why does the Wheeler cap method suit electrically small antennas particularly?

A.They have such narrow bandwidth that a single frequency suffices
B.Their patterns are too broad to be measured on any practical range
C.Their radiation resistance is comparable with their loss resistance
D.They fit inside a cap small enough to be manufactured accurately

Answer: C

For a small antenna the two resistances are of the same order, so the difference the cap reveals is a large and well measured fraction of the total. For an efficient antenna the difference would be a small residue between two nearly equal numbers and the method would be imprecise. Physical size, bandwidth and pattern breadth are practical conveniences rather than the reason. A differential method works best when the difference being measured is not a small remainder.

Discuss in Forum

96.

What does a reverberation chamber measure for an antenna?

A.The far field pattern of the antenna in every plane simultaneously
B.The impedance of the antenna over a wide frequency band at once
C.The polarisation purity of the antenna averaged over all directions
D.Total radiated power and hence efficiency, independent of pattern

Answer: D

A stirred reflective chamber creates a statistically uniform field, so the received or radiated power can be integrated over all directions and polarisations without measuring the pattern at all. That gives total radiated power and, with the input power, the efficiency. Pattern and impedance are measured by other means, and polarisation information is deliberately averaged away, which is exactly what makes the measurement fast and pattern independent.

Discuss in Forum

97.

Why is total radiated power a useful figure for a handset antenna?

A.The handset's orientation in use is unknown and constantly changing
B.The regulator specifies the pattern that a handset must produce
C.The pattern of a handset antenna cannot be measured on any range
D.It is the only measurement that can be made with the case closed

Answer: A

Since a phone is held at arbitrary angles against a head and hand, no single direction of the pattern characterises it usefully, and the power summed over all directions is what predicts performance. Network operators specify it for that reason. Regulators specify emissions and exposure rather than patterns, handset patterns are routinely measured, and a closed case presents no obstacle to a pattern measurement. Choosing a figure of merit that matches how the device is actually used is the point.

Discuss in Forum

98.

What is specific absorption rate?

A.The rate at which a receiver absorbs power from an incident plane wave
B.The power absorbed per unit mass of tissue near a transmitting device
C.The rate at which a substrate absorbs moisture from the surrounding air
D.The proportion of the transmitted power lost in the antenna's own conductors

Answer: B

Specific absorption rate measures how much radiofrequency power is deposited per kilogram of tissue, and exposure limits are written in those terms. Handset antennas are designed and placed to keep it within the limit, which sometimes conflicts with radiation efficiency. Moisture uptake, conductor loss and receiving aperture are quite different quantities. A regulatory limit expressed in terms of an effect on the user, rather than on the equipment, constrains design in ways that purely electrical specifications do not.

Discuss in Forum

99.

Why is the antenna often placed at the bottom of a mobile handset?

A.The battery at the top would otherwise short circuit the antenna
B.It is the only place with room for a quarter wave resonant structure
C.It keeps the radiating structure away from the user's head
D.The circuit board is widest at that end and radiates more efficiently

Answer: C

Distance from the head reduces the specific absorption rate and the detuning that tissue proximity causes, at the cost of the hand gripping that end. It is a compromise between two absorbers rather than an escape from either. Board width, battery placement and available volume all influence the layout but none is the governing reason. Where an antenna is placed inside a product is usually decided by the human body rather than by electromagnetics alone.

Discuss in Forum

100.

What happens to a handset antenna when a hand covers it?

A.It radiates more efficiently because the hand acts as a ground plane
B.It is unaffected because the case shields it from the surrounding tissue
C.Its polarisation rotates to follow the orientation of the hand
D.It detunes and loses efficiency

Answer: D

Tissue is a lossy dielectric close to the radiating structure, so it shifts the resonance and absorbs a substantial fraction of the power, and losses of several decibels are common. Designs are evaluated with standardised hand and head phantoms for this reason. A hand is a poor ground plane and a good absorber, the plastic case provides no shielding at all, and polarisation is set by the current direction. Anything within a fraction of a wavelength becomes part of the antenna, and a hand is no exception.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Microstrip Antennas Questions and Answers || Microstrip Antennas MCQ Questions and Answers || Microstrip Antennas GK Questions and Answers || Microstrip Antennas GK MCQ Questions || Microstrip Antennas Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Microstrip Antennas GK || GK on Microstrip Antennas || Antenna and Wave Propagation Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation MCQ Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation GK Questions and Answers || GK on Antenna and Wave Propagation

Microstrip Antennas Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications